Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 7;5(1):1752. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3451-3

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Distribution of T-RFs relative abundance of the biofilm samples along the flowpath of DNBF. a captured biofilm, b attached biofilm. R1, R2 and R3 were acetate, ethanol and methanol-fed DNBF. BS1, BS2 and BS3 were biofilm sampling at 0, 200 and 400 mm from the bottom of the filter layer