Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 28;9:10.3402/gha.v9.30578. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.30578

Table 5.

Means by quintiles and concentration index of the EBF rate, stunting, wasting, and underweight at 24 weeks

24 weeks Arm N Q1 (%) Q2 (%) Q3 (%) Q4 (%) Q5 (%) Mean Concentration indexa 95% confidence interval
EBF Intervention 748 61.4 51.6 62.7 45.1 35.6 52.3 −0.060 −0.113 −0.006
Control 748 10.2 13.1 8.2 13.4 10.5 11.4 0.049 −0.117 0.215
Total 748 40.8 33.5 41.1 28.1 20.7 32.6 −0.088 −0.145 −0.032
Stunting Intervention 639 32.5 16.8 22.9 17.6 13.2 21.2 −0.135 −0.249 −0.021
Control 639 19.2 17.1 25.9 12.6 9.0 15.7 −0.077 −0.221 0.067
Total 639 27.4 17.0 24.0 14.8 10.9 18.6 −0.120 −0.210 −0.031
Wasting Intervention 639 18.3 7.5 3.0 7.4 5.7 8.9 0.236 −0.423 −0.050
Control 639 5.6 2.9 0b 0b 6.4 3.1 −0.152 −0.590 0.287
Total 639 13.4 5.4 1.9 3.2 6.1 6.1 −0.253 −0.429 −0.078
Underweight Intervention 641 28.9 17.2 15.2 12.1 9.4 17.4 −0.221 −0.342 −0.101
Control 641 21.2 5.9 12.6 8.2 6.3 10.0 −0.186 −0.368 −0.003
Total 641 25.9 12.0 14.2 10.0 7.7 14.0 −0.226 −0.327 −0.125

Statistically significant concentration indices reported in bold font.

a

Concentration indices calculated on binary variables of stunting, wasting, and underweight.

b

Omitted. Means for stunting, wasting and underweight controlled for inverse probability weights. All means controlled for cluster correlation.