Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Jun 14;45(11):2260–2277. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0508-0

Appendix 1.

Covariates Used in in Propensity Score Analyses

Covariates
Source: Archival
1 Student’s gender
2 Student’s ethnicity (Hispanic vs. White)
3 Student’s ethnicity (African American vs White)
4 Student enrolled in bilingual class grade 4
5 Student enrolled in bilingual class in grade 1
6 Student’s economic disadvantaged status
7 School size Grade 8
8 School level math achievement score Grade 8
9 School level reading achievement score Grade 8
Source: Parent
1
0
Highest adult employment level in the household
1
1
Highest adult educational level in household
1
2
Highest educational level expected for student
1
3
Student’s emotional symptoms (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; Goodman, 2001)
1
4
Student’s conduct problems (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; Goodman, 2001)
1
5
Student’s hyperactivity (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; Goodman, 2001)
1
6
Student’s peer problems(Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Goodman, 2001)
Source: Teacher
1
7
Highest educational level expected for student
1
8
Academic performance in classroom (mean rating of reading, math, and overall academic
performance relative to grade level expectancies.
1
9
Student’s conduct problems (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; Goodman, 2001)
2
0
Student’s hyperactivity (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; Goodman, 2001)
2
1
Student’s prosocial behavior (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; Goodman, 2001)
2
2
Home school relationship: alliance (Parent Involvement in Early Years; Hill & Hughes, 2007)
2
3
Parental school involvement (Parent Involvement in Early Years; Hill & Hughes, 2007)
2
4
Classroom behavioral engagement (Student Engagement Questionnaire;
Chen, Hughes, Liew, & Kwok, 2010))
Source: Student
2
5
Teacher-student warmth (Teacher Network of Relationships Inventory;
Hughes, Luo, Kwok, & Loyd, 2008)
2
6
Math competence beliefs (Competence Beliefs and Subjective Task Values;
Wigfield et al., 1997)
2
7
Reading competence beliefs (Competence Beliefs and Subjective Task Values;
Wigfield et al., 1997)
2
8
Sports competence beliefs (Competence Beliefs and Subjective Task Values;
Wigfield et al., 1997)
2
9
Subjective valuing of math achievement (Competence Beliefs and Subjective Task Values;
Wigfield et al., 1997)
3
0
Subjective valuing of reading achievement (Competence Beliefs and Subjective Task Values;
Wigfield et al., 1997)
3
1
Overall academic competence (Competence Beliefs and Subjective Task Values; Wigfield et al., 1997)
3
2
Subjective overall valuing of academic achievement (Competence Beliefs and Subjective
Task Values; Wigfield et al., 1997)
3
3
Subjective valuing of sports (Competence Beliefs and Subjective Task Values;
Wigfield et al., 1997)
3
4
Overall scholastic competence (Self Perception Profile for Childre; Harter, 1985)
3
5
Social competence (Self Perception Profile for Children; Harter, 1985)
3
6
Athletic competence (Self Perception Profile for Children; Harter, 1985)
3 School belonging (Psychological Sense of School Membership; Goodman, 2001)
3
8
Classroom performance approach goal structure (Student Perception of Classroom Goals;
Midgley et al., 2000)
3
9
Classroom performance avoidance goal structure (Student Perception of Classroom Goals;
Midgley et al., 2000)
4
0
Friends’ prosocial orientation (student reported percentage of friends with prosocial
behaviors)
4
1
Student-reported victimization in classroom
4
2
Locus of control (Student Perception of Control Questionnaire;
Skinner, Zimmer-Gembeck, & Connell, 1998)
4
3
Peer affiliation: structured activities. Student report of participating in structured activities
with friends
Source: Performance
4
4
Student’s dominant language (Woodcock-Munoz Language Survey. 1993)
4
5
Woodcock-Johnson III Broad Reading W Score (Woodcock, McGrew, & Mather, 2001)
4
6
Woodcock-Johnson III Broad Math W Score (Woodcock, McGrew, & Mather, 2001

Note. All measures were assessed at Grade 4 or 5 unless otherwise indicated. Additional information on these variables is available from the first author.