Appendix 1.
Covariates Used in in Propensity Score Analyses
Covariates | |
---|---|
Source: Archival | |
1 | Student’s gender |
2 | Student’s ethnicity (Hispanic vs. White) |
3 | Student’s ethnicity (African American vs White) |
4 | Student enrolled in bilingual class grade 4 |
5 | Student enrolled in bilingual class in grade 1 |
6 | Student’s economic disadvantaged status |
7 | School size Grade 8 |
8 | School level math achievement score Grade 8 |
9 | School level reading achievement score Grade 8 |
Source: Parent | |
1 0 |
Highest adult employment level in the household |
1 1 |
Highest adult educational level in household |
1 2 |
Highest educational level expected for student |
1 3 |
Student’s emotional symptoms (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; Goodman, 2001) |
1 4 |
Student’s conduct problems (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; Goodman, 2001) |
1 5 |
Student’s hyperactivity (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; Goodman, 2001) |
1 6 |
Student’s peer problems(Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Goodman, 2001) |
Source: Teacher | |
1 7 |
Highest educational level expected for student |
1 8 |
Academic performance in classroom (mean rating of reading, math, and overall academic performance relative to grade level expectancies. |
1 9 |
Student’s conduct problems (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; Goodman, 2001) |
2 0 |
Student’s hyperactivity (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; Goodman, 2001) |
2 1 |
Student’s prosocial behavior (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; Goodman, 2001) |
2 2 |
Home school relationship: alliance (Parent Involvement in Early Years; Hill & Hughes, 2007) |
2 3 |
Parental school involvement (Parent Involvement in Early Years; Hill & Hughes, 2007) |
2 4 |
Classroom behavioral engagement (Student Engagement Questionnaire; Chen, Hughes, Liew, & Kwok, 2010)) |
Source: Student | |
2 5 |
Teacher-student warmth (Teacher Network of Relationships Inventory; Hughes, Luo, Kwok, & Loyd, 2008) |
2 6 |
Math competence beliefs (Competence Beliefs and Subjective Task Values; Wigfield et al., 1997) |
2 7 |
Reading competence beliefs (Competence Beliefs and Subjective Task Values; Wigfield et al., 1997) |
2 8 |
Sports competence beliefs (Competence Beliefs and Subjective Task Values; Wigfield et al., 1997) |
2 9 |
Subjective valuing of math achievement (Competence Beliefs and Subjective Task Values; Wigfield et al., 1997) |
3 0 |
Subjective valuing of reading achievement (Competence Beliefs and Subjective Task Values; Wigfield et al., 1997) |
3 1 |
Overall academic competence (Competence Beliefs and Subjective Task Values; Wigfield et al., 1997) |
3 2 |
Subjective overall valuing of academic achievement (Competence Beliefs and Subjective Task Values; Wigfield et al., 1997) |
3 3 |
Subjective valuing of sports (Competence Beliefs and Subjective Task Values; Wigfield et al., 1997) |
3 4 |
Overall scholastic competence (Self Perception Profile for Childre; Harter, 1985) |
3 5 |
Social competence (Self Perception Profile for Children; Harter, 1985) |
3 6 |
Athletic competence (Self Perception Profile for Children; Harter, 1985) |
3 | School belonging (Psychological Sense of School Membership; Goodman, 2001) |
3 8 |
Classroom performance approach goal structure (Student Perception of Classroom Goals; Midgley et al., 2000) |
3 9 |
Classroom performance avoidance goal structure (Student Perception of Classroom Goals; Midgley et al., 2000) |
4 0 |
Friends’ prosocial orientation (student reported percentage of friends with prosocial behaviors) |
4 1 |
Student-reported victimization in classroom |
4 2 |
Locus of control (Student Perception of Control Questionnaire; Skinner, Zimmer-Gembeck, & Connell, 1998) |
4 3 |
Peer affiliation: structured activities. Student report of participating in structured activities with friends |
Source: Performance | |
4 4 |
Student’s dominant language (Woodcock-Munoz Language Survey. 1993) |
4 5 |
Woodcock-Johnson III Broad Reading W Score (Woodcock, McGrew, & Mather, 2001) |
4 6 |
Woodcock-Johnson III Broad Math W Score (Woodcock, McGrew, & Mather, 2001 |
Note. All measures were assessed at Grade 4 or 5 unless otherwise indicated. Additional information on these variables is available from the first author.