Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 10;3:90. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00090

Table 2.

Results of the scenarios on a low-hygiene herd with a baseline true within-herd prevalence of 45%.

Scenario
ECM (5%; 95%) TP (5%; 95%) AP (5%; 95%)
No control 19.83 (19.57; 20.08) 38.73 (28.43; 47.80) 27.32 (19.60; 34.32)
Three actions 19.90 (19.66; 20.16) 19.61 (10.78; 28.30) 15.12 (8.33; 22.06)
All actions 20.03 (19.76; 20.32) 0.00 (0.00; 0.00) 0.99 (0.00; 2.48)
Remove calves 19.84 (19.59; 20.08) 34.31 (22.80; 44.35) 24.15 (16.33; 31.53)
Handle colostrum 19.84 (19.60; 20.08) 33.25 (22.69; 43.00) 23.96 (15.76; 31.26)
Handle waste milk 19.86 (19.61; 20.12) 30.64 (19.99; 41.48) 22.44 (14.29; 30.40)
Cull pos. cows 20.01 (19.75; 20.29) 0.00 (0.00; 1.47) 1.46 (0.00; 2.96)

EXP (5%; 95%) INC (5%; 95%) TNR (5%; 95%)

No control 5.04 (4.97; 5.10) 8.00 (7.86; 8.13) 2.97 (2.86; 3.05)
Three actions 5.17 (5.10; 5.23) 8.03 (7.90; 8.16) 2.87 (2.76; 2.95)
All actions 5.16 (5.09; 5.23) 8.11 (7.97; 8.23) 2.95 (2.85; 3.03)
Remove calves 5.14 (5.07; 5.20) 8.01 (7.87; 8.12) 2.87 (2.77; 2.95)
Handle colostrum 5.09 (5.04; 5.15) 8.01 (7.87; 8.14) 2.92 (2.81; 3.01)
Handle waste milk 5.07 (5.01; 5.14) 8.02 (7.88; 8.14) 2.94 (2.85; 3.03)
Cull pos. cows 5.08 (5.01; 5.15) 8.10 (7.97; 8.23) 3.02 (2.93; 3.11)

ECM, kilograms of ECM milk yield from of all cows on the farm; TP, true within-herd prevalence; AP, apparent within-herd prevalence; EXP, expenses in €; INC, income in €; TNR, total net revenue in million € over 10 years.

The numbers are median results with 5 and 95% confidence limits, calculated over the 10 simulated years. Milk yield and economic values are shown in millions. Prevalences shown in % are the resulting prevalences at the end of the simulations.