Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016 Jun 11;29(9):861–870. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2016.05.002

Table 4.

Echo-Quantified RV Parameters in Relation to CMR Quantified RV Volumes and Function

Correlation Coefficient (r) P Regression Equation

Diastolic Chamber Size
  Linear parameters
    Basal RV width 0.70 <0.001 y = 4.33x − 19.0
    Mid RV width 0.60 <0.001 y = 3.80x + 38.3
    RV length 0.61 <0.001 y = 2.60x − 67.7
    Proximal RVOT width 0.68 <0.001 y = 5.10x − 26.0
    Distal RVOT width * 0.43 <0.001 y = 3.76x + 48.5
  Area (4-chamber) 0.60 <0.001 y = 4.47x + 58.8

Systolic Chamber Size
  Linear parameters
    Basal RV width 0.68 <0.001 y = 3.43x − 28.3
    Mid RV width 0.64 <0.001 y = 3.74x − 3.1
    RV length 0.65 <0.001 y = 2.31x − 96.2
    Proximal RVOT width 0.66 <0.001 y = 3.87x − 31.7
    Distal RVOT width * 0.46 <0.001 y = 3.51x + 1.2
  Area (4-chamber) 0.67 <0.001 y = 4.80x + 18.0

Contractile Function
  Fractional Shortening
    Basal RV width 0.31 <0.001 y = 0.36x + 46.8
    Mid RV width 0.31 <0.001 y = 0.26x + 47.9
    RV length 0.13 0.04 y = 0.22x + 54.0
    Proximal RVOT width 0.38 <0.001 y = 0.50x + 44.1
    Distal RVOT width 0.22 <0.001 y = 0.29x + 48.8
  Fractional area change 0.55 <0.001 y = 0.47x + 33.4
  RVS’ 0.36 <0.001 y = 1.86x + 35.3
  TAPSE 0.48 <0.001 y = 12.52x + 31.5
*

Unobtainable in 6 patients (2%) due to absence of distal RVOT image acquisition