Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 10;13:91. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0201-2

Table 3.

The relationship between task performance of subjects with stroke and Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Behavioural Inattention Test (BIT) scores is shown by the corresponding Spearman correlations

Parameters (normative models) Spearman correlations r s (P)
FIM total MoCA BIT
Global performance
Target hits 0.52 (3×10−12) 0.38 (1×10−6) 0.48 (2×10−10)
Distractor hits −0.14 (0.09) −0.31 (1×10−4) −0.17 (0.03)
Object hits 0.45 (3×10−9) 0.23 (0.004) 0.40 (2×10−7)
Distractor proportion −0.45 (4×10−9) −0.49 (2×10−10) −0.43 (2×10−8)
Object processing rate 0.39 (6×10−7) 0.27 (6×10−4) 0.33 (3×10−5)
Spatial and temporal performance
Miss bias 0.10 (0.22) −0.08 (0.32) 0.20 (0.01)
Hand transition −0.16 (0.05) −0.11 (0.17) −0.03 (0.72)
Median error 0.48 (3×10−10) 0.36 (6×10−6) 0.44 (8×10−9)
Hand specific performance
Hand bias (hits) −0.01 (0.93) 0.12 (0.15) −0.20 (0.01)
Hand selection overlap 0.30 (2×10−4) 0.11 (0.18) 0.10 (0.21)
Total hand bias area 0.02 (0.80) 0.15 (0.07) −0.15 (0.06)
Hand bias speed −0.01 (0.87) 0.13 (0.11) −0.18 (0.02)
Object hits Affected 0.51 (1×10−11) 0.24 (0.003) 0.38 (7×10−7)
Unaffected 0.26 (8×10-4) 0.17 (0.04) 0.30 (1×10-4)
Distractor proportion Affected −0.45 (5×10−9) −0.31 (8×10−5) −0.36 (4×10−6)
Unaffected −0.37 (2×10−6) −0.48 (4×10−10) −0.41 (9×10−8)
Total hand area affected 0.44 (6×10−9) 0.07 (0.43) 0.22 (0.005)
Unaffected 0.14 (0.08) 0.17 (0.04) 0.29 (3×10−4)
hand speed Affected 0.52 (3×10−12) 0.14 (0.09) 0.33 (2×10−5)
Unaffected 0.24 (0.002) 0.16 (0.06) 0.35 (7×10−6)
Parameters impaired −0.61 (2×10−17) −0.31 (1×10−4) −0.43 (3×10−8)

Abbreviations: RH (right hand), LH (left hand), LA (left-affected subject), RA (right-affected subject)