Table 3.
The relationship between task performance of subjects with stroke and Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Behavioural Inattention Test (BIT) scores is shown by the corresponding Spearman correlations
Parameters (normative models) | Spearman correlations r s (P) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
FIM total | MoCA | BIT | ||
Global performance | ||||
Target hits | 0.52 (3×10−12) | 0.38 (1×10−6) | 0.48 (2×10−10) | |
Distractor hits | −0.14 (0.09) | −0.31 (1×10−4) | −0.17 (0.03) | |
Object hits | 0.45 (3×10−9) | 0.23 (0.004) | 0.40 (2×10−7) | |
Distractor proportion | −0.45 (4×10−9) | −0.49 (2×10−10) | −0.43 (2×10−8) | |
Object processing rate | 0.39 (6×10−7) | 0.27 (6×10−4) | 0.33 (3×10−5) | |
Spatial and temporal performance | ||||
Miss bias | 0.10 (0.22) | −0.08 (0.32) | 0.20 (0.01) | |
Hand transition | −0.16 (0.05) | −0.11 (0.17) | −0.03 (0.72) | |
Median error | 0.48 (3×10−10) | 0.36 (6×10−6) | 0.44 (8×10−9) | |
Hand specific performance | ||||
Hand bias (hits) | −0.01 (0.93) | 0.12 (0.15) | −0.20 (0.01) | |
Hand selection overlap | 0.30 (2×10−4) | 0.11 (0.18) | 0.10 (0.21) | |
Total hand bias area | 0.02 (0.80) | 0.15 (0.07) | −0.15 (0.06) | |
Hand bias speed | −0.01 (0.87) | 0.13 (0.11) | −0.18 (0.02) | |
Object hits | Affected | 0.51 (1×10−11) | 0.24 (0.003) | 0.38 (7×10−7) |
Unaffected | 0.26 (8×10-4) | 0.17 (0.04) | 0.30 (1×10-4) | |
Distractor proportion | Affected | −0.45 (5×10−9) | −0.31 (8×10−5) | −0.36 (4×10−6) |
Unaffected | −0.37 (2×10−6) | −0.48 (4×10−10) | −0.41 (9×10−8) | |
Total hand area | affected | 0.44 (6×10−9) | 0.07 (0.43) | 0.22 (0.005) |
Unaffected | 0.14 (0.08) | 0.17 (0.04) | 0.29 (3×10−4) | |
hand speed | Affected | 0.52 (3×10−12) | 0.14 (0.09) | 0.33 (2×10−5) |
Unaffected | 0.24 (0.002) | 0.16 (0.06) | 0.35 (7×10−6) | |
Parameters impaired | −0.61 (2×10−17) | −0.31 (1×10−4) | −0.43 (3×10−8) |
Abbreviations: RH (right hand), LH (left hand), LA (left-affected subject), RA (right-affected subject)