Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 11.
Published in final edited form as: Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2016 May 24;830:119–129. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2016.05.085

Figure 14.

Figure 14

(a) Average energy resolution as a function of the DRS4 sampling rate. (b) The energies corresponding 511 keV peak in each SiPM is compared to the relative SiPM gain shown in Figure 5. The relative SiPM gains are arbitrarily scaled so that the average SiPM gain for each strip-line board equals 100.