Table 2.

Coding Procedure for Affiliative Statements

Step #	Procedure
1	Rater 1 coded the video first. Affiliative statements were coded at the time at which they were heard in the video. The gender of the speaker and recipient of affiliative statements was also coded for GDC videos. When an affiliative statement was directed at two or more recipients, only the gender of the speaker was coded. Additionally, Rater 1 coded 10 non-affiliative statements that did not meet criteria for an affiliative statement at random times throughout the video. Non-affiliative statements were coded to demonstrate that the raters could discriminate between affiliative and non-affiliative statements.
2	Rater 1 printed a timesheet that indicated the times when she coded a statement. No other information was included on the timesheet.
3	Rater 2 then coded the same video using the timesheet provided by Rater 1. Rater 2 listened to the entire video and coded statements based on the times at which Rater 1 had coded statements. Rater 2 also coded any additional affiliative statements missed by Rater 1, but did not add any non-affiliative statements.
4	If Rater 2 identified any additional affiliative statements, Rater 1 revisited the video and listened to the statements made during the times when Rater 2 coded the extra statements. Rater 1 coded these statements if she agreed that the statements met criteria for an affiliative statement.
5	The raters discussed any disagreements in coding until they reached 100% agreement on appropriate coding of statements.