Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Addict. 2016 Sep 20;25(7):573–580. doi: 10.1111/ajad.12443

Table 3.

Comparison of the rates of affiliative statements in WRG versus GDC

Type of Statement Rate/hour WRG, mean (SD) Rate/hour GDC, mean (SD) Adjusted Relative Rate of statements occurring in WRG versus GDC (95% C.I.) t-value p-value
Total Statements** 37.42 (17.53) 26.38 (18.91) 1.66 (1.19, 2.32) −3.01 .0038

Shared Experience** 5.42 (2.59) 3.32 (2.30) 1.64 (1.23, 2.17) −3.46 .0010
Agreement 10.82 (6.31) 7.69 (6.57) 1.70 (1.05, 2.74) −2.21 .0305
Supportive*** 2.63 (2.41) 1.41 (1.61) 2.33 (1.48, 3.67) −3.73 .0004
Completing a thought 3.50 (3.56) 2.50 (2.36) 1.53 (0.79, 2.96) −1.29 .2027
Strategy** 2.29 (2.03) 1.36 (1.62) 2.21 (1.37, 3.58) −3.30 .0015
Therapeutic 9.91 (6.11) 7.86 (6.55) 1.45 (1.04, 2.03) −2.21 .0309
Positive statement about the group 0.49 (0.70) 0.26 (0.67) 2.40 (1.00, 5.76) −1.99 .0508
Engaging Question 2.34 (2.09) 1.85 (2.28) 1.45 (0.70, 3.00) −1.01 .3148
**

p < .01,

***

p < .001

Note: The Rate/hour summary data for WRG and GDC are based on unadjusted means. The Adjusted Relative Rate of statements controls for the number of participants in group and the therapist.