Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 11;5:e18313. doi: 10.7554/eLife.18313

Table 1.

Txnip/GLUT interactions determined by FLIM.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18313.014

Table 1—source data 1. Statistical analysis for Table 1.
This table represents the statistical analysis conducted on the raw data collected for Table 1 using GraphPad Prism 5.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.18313.015
Regular diet (RD)
Donor only GLUT2 GLUT5
a1 (%) Experiment 1 100 35 ± 2 32 ± 9
Experiment 2 100 36 ± 4 36 ± 1
Experiment 3 100 36 ± 2 35 ± 3
Average a1 (%) N/A 35 34 ± 1
τ1 (ps)Experiment 1 2701 ± 33 2169 ± 43 2102 ± 48
Experiment 2 2196 ± 15 1615 ± 60 1657 ± 26
Experiment 3 2139 ± 36 1587 ± 30 1695 ± 31
% of τ1 (ps) vs donor only N/A 76 ± 2 77 ± 1
Fructose-supplemented diet (FSD)
Donor only GLUT2 GLUT5
a1 (%) Experiment 1 100 49 ± 4 31 ± 5
Experiment 2 100 45 ± 2 36 ± 3
Experiment 3 100 55 ± 2 36 ± 3
Average a1 (%) N/A 50 ± 3 34 ± 2
τ1 (ps) Experiment 1 2482 ± 35 1621 ± 51 1263 ± 99
Experiment 2 2495 ± 62 1701 ± 38 1572 ± 53
Experiment 3 2298 ± 72 1575 ± 10 1602 ± 34
% of τ1 (ps) vs donor only N/A 67 ± 1* 60 ± 6*

Values represent mean percent change ± SEM.

*p<0.05 vs. regular diet.

p<0.01 vs. regular diet.