Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2016 Oct 12;36(41):10545–10559. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1178-16.2016

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

Copyright © 2016 Leib et al.

This article is freely available online through the J Neurosci Author Open Choice option.

PMC Copyright notice

Figure 3. — No change in kinematic or dynamic features of probing movements. A, There were no statistically significant differences in any of the tested movement parameters when probing the delayed force fields in the non-cTBS and cTBS sessions. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals estimated using t distribution. ARD, Area reaching deviation. B, Mean number of probing movements during trials in which the standard force field was nondelayed. Bars represent the number of probing movements during interaction with the nondelayed standard and comparison force fields as a function of the comparison force field stiffness values. The count of probing movements was similar between the cTBS and no-cTBS sessions for both force fields. Bar color and fill pattern distinguish between the results for force-field type (standard or comparison) and PPC cTBS condition (cTBS or no-cTBS). C, Same as in B but for trials in which the standard force field was delayed. Similar to the trials in which the standard force field was nondelayed, we found no PPC cTBS effect on the number of probing movements during trials in which the standard force field was delayed.