Table 2.
Results of the evaluation after completion of the two virtual patient cases. The students rated statements on a scale ranging from 6 (strongly agree) to 1 (strongly disagree).
| Basic | Supplement | All | P valuea | |
| 1. I was busier with language problems than with the analysis of the case. | 2.5 | 3 | 3 | .29 |
| 2. The clinical relevance of the cases was understandable. | 6 | 6 | 6 | .42 |
| 3. For me it was difficult to understand the technical instructions in English. | 1.5 | 2 | 2 | .35 |
| 4. For me it was motivating to work with a case written in English. | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | .66 |
| 5. Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are different to the strategies and procedures I am aware of. | 4 | 5 | 4.5 | .39 |
| 6. Medical students interacted with the patients in a way that was different from the interaction I am aware of. | 2 | 3.5 | 2 | .13 |
| 7. The described medical situation can be readily transferred to practices in Germany. | 5 | 3 | 4 | .048 |
| 8. I realized differences more readily using the additional information in the supplement. | n/a | 5 | n/a | |
| 9. The supplements were helpful in working with the cases. | n/a | 4 | n/a |
aP values were calculated using the Mann-Whitney U Test.