Table 2.
Situation type |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Moral harm | Prudential | Pragmatic | |
Disorder | 0.00a | 0.04a | 0.25b*** |
Evaluation | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.16 |
Feelings/desires | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.07 |
Harm to child | 0.00a | 0.44b | 0.01a*** |
Harm to others | 0.63a | 0.00b | 0.01b*** |
Property ownership | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
Rule | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.11 |
Sanction | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.05 |
Other reason | 0.20a | 0.29a,b | 0.45b*** |
The table shows number of situations in which the mother used a particular explanation type divided by the number of situations in which a mother used any explanation, calculated separately for each domain. P-values are adjusted for multiple tests using Holm’s (1979) procedure. Cells with different subscripts differ significantly (adjusted p < 0.05). *** Situation effect is significant (adjusted p <.001).