Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 27;2016:6542962. doi: 10.1155/2016/6542962

Table 3.

Post hoc group comparisons (i.e., control, DLB, and AD) on measures of attention.

Variable Group Comparison group Mean difference Std. error p
TEA1min (map search) AD Control −8.77 3.45 .014
DLB 10.38 3.78 .008
DLB AD −10.38 3.78 .008
Control −19.15 3.74 .000

TEA12min (map search) AD Control −21.84 4.58 <.001
DLB 15.42 5.00 .003
DLB AD −15.42 5.00 .003
Control −37.26 4.95 <.001

TEA2 (elevator counting) AD Control −.15 .31 .617
DLB .88 .34 .011
DLB AD −.88 .34 .011
Control −1.04 .33 .003

TEA3 (elevator counting with distraction) AD Control −2.99 .85 .001
DLB −.57 .93 .545
DLB AD .57 .93 .545
Control −2.42 .92 .011

TEA4RAW (visual elevator) AD Control −3.86 .88 <.001
DLB .32 .96 .742
DLB AD −.32 .96 .742
Control −4.17 .95 <.001

TEA5 (elevator counting with reversal) AD Control −3.21 .56 <.001
DLB −.07 .61 .914
DLB AD .07 .61 .914
Control −3.14 .61 <.001

TEA6 (telephone search) AD Control 4.73 2.13 .031
DLB −3.00 2.33 .203
DLB AD 3.00 2.33 .203
Control 7.74 2.31 .001

TEA7 (telephone search while counting) AD Control 61.98 25.28 .018
DLB 54.76 27.64 .053
Control AD −61.98 25.28 .018
DLB −7.22 27.35 .793
DLB AD −54.76 27.64 .053
Control 7.22 27.35 .793

TEA8 (lottery) AD Control −4.20 .81 <.001
DLB −.25 .89 .780
DLB AD .25 .89 .780
Control −3.95 .88 .000

UFOV1 (processing speed) AD Control 118.25 33.12 .001
DLB −128.92 36.21 .001
DLB AD 128.92 36.21 .001
Control 247.16 35.84 <.001

UFOV2 (divided attention) AD Control 253.58 39.63 <.001
DLB −26.10 43.32 .549
DLB AD 26.10 43.32 .549
Control 279.68 42.88 <.001

UFOV3 (selective attention) AD Control 147.64 28.54 <.001
DLB −37.80 31.20 .231
DLB AD 37.80 31.20 .231
Control 185.44 30.88 <.001