Table 1.
Dose (Gy) | Treatment | TCC | TAM | TAC | Fragments | Gaps | Dicentrics | RT | DLE | EX | ACR (%)∗ | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMT | CTT | CMT | CTT | CMT | CTT | Mean | SD | ||||||||
.0a | Nonhydrogen | 828 | 144 | 148 | 84 | 18 | 12 | 16 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 17.420 | 3.097 |
Hydrogen | 842 | 146 | 148 | 84 | 12 | 4 | 14 | 14 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 17.380 | 1.731 | |
| |||||||||||||||
.1ab | Nonhydrogen | 848 | 164 | 164 | 98 | 22 | 14 | 12 | 4 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 19.349 | 1.758 |
Hydrogen | 852 | 152 | 154 | 108 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 17.865 | 2.852 | |
| |||||||||||||||
.5ab | Nonhydrogen | 898 | 192 | 192 | 130 | 26 | 10 | 4 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 21.390 | 4.122 |
Hydrogen | 840 | 144 | 146 | 78 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 17.117 | 1.135 | |
| |||||||||||||||
1.0b | Nonhydrogen | 826 | 192 | 198 | 104 | 28 | 14 | 26 | 4 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 23.222 | 1.038 |
Hydrogen | 830 | 152 | 154 | 70 | 32 | 4 | 12 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 18.286 | 2.016 | |
| |||||||||||||||
2.0c | Nonhydrogen | 834 | 296 | 298 | 170 | 50 | 18 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 35.485 | 3.298 |
Hydrogen | 858 | 244 | 244 | 134 | 22 | 8 | 30 | 10 | 26 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 28.350 | 3.207 |
All sorts of CAs are scored and displayed here. In each group, eight mice were included for this evaluation, with at least 100 metaphases examined for each of them (n = 8). Dose: radiation doses exposed to animals; treatment: whether treating the subjects with hydrogen or not; TCC: total counted cells. TAM: total aberrant metaphases. TAC: total aberrant chromosomes. CMT: chromosomal type; CTT: chromatid type. RT: Robertsonian translocation. DEL: deletion. EX: exchange.
∗Aberrant cells rate were compared with the method of two-way ANOVA. As for the radiation factor, F = 81.457 and p = 0.000; hydrogen: F = 37.349 and p = 0.000. Furthermore, there existed statistically interaction between radiation and hydrogen treatment (F = 4.662, p = 0.002). The LSD-test was selected for the subsequent comparisons between each radiation dose group.
The aberrant cells rates of groups that have totally different superscripts are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05 as significant, SNK test was used here).