Table 5.
Experiments | 2010Enid (GC) | 2011F_GH (GC) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
p | R 2 (%)a | p | R 2 (%)a | |
GH_experiments (PHS) | NS | - | NS | - |
2013MH (PHS) | <2e-16 | 43.7 | <2e-16 | 44.5 |
2013Hays (PHS) | <2e-16 | 42.9 | <2e-16 | 43.6 |
2014MH (PHS) | 1.27E-10 | 26.3 | 3.13E-11 | 27.5 |
2014Hays (PHS) | 1.13E-15 | 35.6 | 3.41E-15 | 34.8 |
Field_BLUP b(PHS) | <2e-16 | 43.9 | <2e-16 | 44.1 |
aPhenotypic variance explained by grain color in each PHS experiment, which is derived from the analysis of variance (ANOVA) where grain color (GC) was used as the explanatory variable and pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) resistance as the response variable
bField_BLUP = Best Linear Unbiased Predictions calculated from all four field experiment