Skip to main content

Table 2.

Option item response (%) for two observers, Cohen's kappa and intraclass correlation (ICC)

OPTION item 0 1 2 3 4 Kappa* ICC
 1. The clinician draws attention to an identified problem as one that requires a decision‐making process
 Observer 1 96.4 3.6 0 0 0 0.53 (0.52) 0.33
 Observer 2 93.6 4.5 1.8 0 0
 2. The clinician states that there is more than one way to deal with the identified problem (‘equipoise’)
 Observer 1 91.8 6.4 1.8 0 0 0.88 (0.88) 0.93
 Observer 2 91.8 6.4 1.8 0 0
 3. The clinician assesses the patient's preferred approach to receiving information to assist decision making
 Observer 1 99.1 0.9 0 0 0 0.98 (0.98) 0.98
 Observer 2 100 0 0 0 0
 4. The clinician lists ‘options’, which can include the choice of ‘no action’
 Observer 1 90 9.1 0.9 0 0 0.64 (0.76) 0.77
 Observer 2 84.5 11.8 3.6 0 0
 5. The clinician explains the pros and cons of options to the patient (taking ‘no action’ is an option)
 Observer 1 95.5 4.5 0 0 0 0.70 (0.70) 0.70
 Observer 2 91.8 8.2 0 0 0
 6. The clinician explores the patient's expectations (or ideas) about how the problem(s) are to be managed
 Observer 1 95.5 4.5 0 0 0 0.56 (0.56) 0.56
 Observer 2 98.2 1.8 0 0 0
 7. The clinician explores the patient's concerns (fears) about how problem(s) are to be managed
 Observer 1 95.5 3.6 0.9 0 0 0.51 (0.59) 0.61
 Observer 2 92.7 7.3 0 0 0
 8. The clinician checks that the patient has understood the information
 Observer 1 91.8 8.2 0 0 0 0.08 (0.10) 0.11
 Observer 2 36.4 61.8 1.8 0 0
 9. The clinician offers the patient explicit opportunities to ask questions during the decision‐making process
 Observer 1 56.4 43.6 0 0 0 0.45 (0.48) 0.48
 Observer 2 60 38.2 1.8 0 0
10. The clinician elicits the patient's preferred level of involvement in decision making
 Observer 1 99.1 0.9 0 0 0 0.98 (0.98) 0.98
 Observer 2 100 0 0 0 0
11. The clinician indicates the need for a decision‐making (or deferring) stage
 Observer 1 100 0 0 0 0 0.84 (0.84) 0.84
 Observer 2 91.8 8.2 0 0 0
12. The clinician indicates the need to review the decision (or deferment)
 Observer 1 79.1 20 0.9 0 0 0.67 (0.67) 0.61
 Observer 2 79.1 20.9 0 0 0

*Kappa scores are for five‐point scale agreement. Scores in brackets are for agreement across binary scale points (no involvement/involvement).