Table 3.
Logistic regression model (N = 822) (>0 reports vs. 0 reports) | Negative binomial model (N = 560) (among frequent users: ≥3 reports) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Odds ratio (95% CI) | P‐value | Incidence rate ratio (95% CI) | P‐value | |
Gender | ||||
Male (reference group) | ||||
Female | 1.05 (0.58, 1.91) | 0.87 | 0.95 (0.83, 1.08) | 0.41 |
Race/ethnicity | ||||
White (reference group) | ||||
Black | 1.06 (0.55, 2.02) | 0.87 | 0.83 (0.71, −0.98) | 0.03 |
Other | 0.70 (0.35, 1.37) | 0.29 | 1.05 (0.88, 1.25) | 0.59 |
Age group (years) | ||||
<26 (reference group) | ||||
26–35 | 1.04 (0.33, 3.28) | 0.95 | 2.08 (1.31, 3.30) | <0.01 |
36–45 | 1.19 (0.37, 3.76) | 0.77 | 1.92 (1.20, 3.07) | <0.01 |
>46 | 1.23 (0.37, 4.07) | 0.73 | 1.95 (1.21, 3.13) | <0.01 |
Rank | ||||
Junior Enlisted Personnel (E1–E4) (reference group) | ||||
Senior Enlisted Personnel (E5–E9, W1–W5) | 0.85 (0.24, 3.01) | 0.80 | 1.06 (0.66, 1.68) | 0.82 |
Officer | 1.78 (0.48, 6.66) | 0.39 | 1.03 (0.64, 1.64) | 0.92 |
Civilian | 1.79 (0.45, 7.11) | 0.41 | 1.04 (0.64, 1.67) | 0.89 |
Goodness‐of‐fit | Hosmer and Lemeshow, P = 0.83 | Deviance/d.f. = 1.03; Pearson chi‐square/d.f. = 1.03 |
E1–E4, E5–E9 are enlisted soldiers (grades 1–4 are junior; 5–9 are more senior enlisted soldiers). W1–W5 (Warrant officers) are more senior than enlisted men but are not commissioned officers.