Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 23;13(3):244–257. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00587.x

Table 3.

 Principal components analysis of the shared decision‐making items

Aspect of consultation Subscales
I II III
Treatment Evidence Patient challenges
Item 15: multiple options presented 0.78 0.27 −0.03
Item 20: option to defer decision 0.73 0.06 0.21
Item 16: treatment process described 0.68 0.21 −0.16
Item 19: patient values considered 0.61 0.13 0.01
Item 10: patient views enquired upon 0.55 0.05 0.11
Item 14: treatment option presented 0.45 −0.07 −0.04
Item 13: ensure patient understanding 0.37 −0.05 0.22
Item 7: quality of research discussed 0.02 0.83 0.05
Item 8: physician appraisal of data −0.09 0.82 0.06
Item 9: research relevant to patient 0.22 0.73 0.35
Item 6: evidence presented 0.35 0.61 0.45
Item 2: history reviewed −0.05 0.43 −0.14
Item 11: asked re amount of information 0.15 0.37 −0.07
Item 1: reason for consultation established 0.36 0.37 −0.21
Item 12: asked re decision preference 0.20 0.30 −0.09
Item 18: possibilities & outcomes discussed 0.04 −0.06 0.82
Item 17: side‐effects discussed 0.13 −0.11 0.76
Item 3: social circumstances reviewed −0.24 0.27 0.35
Cronbach’s alpha 0.74 0.75 0.50

The largest Cronbach’s alpha values are given in bold.