Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 4;13(4):392–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00595.x

Table 5.

 Association between frequency of outcome‐probability utilities rank order consistency, and age and outcome importance (N = 66)

Outcome Age Importance
Pearson r P‐value Pearson r P‐value
Five‐year survival 0.06 0.66 0.32 0.01
Five‐year local control1 −0.29 0.02 0.14 0.26
Faecal incontinence2 0.03 0.80 0.48 0.00
Sexual dysfunction
 Overall3 0.16 0.20 0.56 0.00
Men (N = 44)3 0.13 0.41 0.62 0.00
Women (N = 21) 0.22 0.34 0.31 0.17

1One inconsistent participant was excluded because he conferred the highest utility to the worst probability.

2Two inconsistent participants were excluded because they conferred the highest utility to the worst probability.

3One inconsistent participant was excluded because he conferred the highest utility to the worst probability.