Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 4;13(4):350–358. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00589.x

Table 2.

 Patient satisfaction with hospital treatment for a heart attack (% rating each aspect of care as ‘excellent’)

Intervention
% (n/N) Control
% (n/N) Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)* P‐value
(a) Efficiency with which you were treated 83% (305/369) 74% (162/219) 1.72 (1.14, 2.59) 0.009
(b) Professional skill and ability of doctors and nurses 81% (297/368) 73% (161/221) 1.50 (1.10, 2.24) 0.052
(c) Overall experience of being treated for a heart attack 78% (287/367) 71% (155/218) 1.42 (097, 2.09) 0.074
(d) Time waited before having treatment 80% (292/364) 67% (148/219) 2.17 (1.45, 3.22) 0.001
(e) Confidence in doctors and nurses treating you 75% (278/369) 69% (151/219) 1.32 (0.86, 2.03) 0.549
(f) Confidence in the treatment received 71% (263/370) 61% (134/218) 1.52 (1.06, 2.17) 0.022
(g) Explanations given about what was wrong with you 56% (206/365) 50% (109/220) 1.18 (0.68, 2.03) 0.549
(h) Ease and convenience for friends and family to visit 54% (196/363) 51% (111/219) 1.12 (0.80, 1.58) 0.502
(i) Explanations given of risks & benefits of treatment 47% (170/361) 44% (96/216) 1.07 (0.70, 1.62) 0.750
(j) Time spent waiting to be discharged from hospital 38% (115/306) 46% (84/182) 0.77 (0.51, 1.55) 0.205
(k) Involvement in decisions about treatment 37% (133/357) 32% 70/216) 1.23 (0.75, 2.01) 0.409
(l) Information about medication & potential side‐effects 34% (104/308) 38% (69/183) 0.81 (0.54, 1.23) 0.322
(m) Support and follow‐up provided once left hospital 36% (108/300) 32% (56/175) 1.04 (0.62, 1.75) 0.873
(n) Information given about how to manage condition in future 25% (78/311) 30% (55/182) 0.68 (0.47, 0.99) 0.049

*Adjusted for patient age and sex.