Test was offered/media attention |
Generally no problems |
Test is offered by well‐known organization |
Normal test result: Reassurance, no further action |
Explanation about disease |
Curious |
Problems experienced |
Tests are also used by professionals |
Discuss test with doctor |
Types of cholesterol |
Asymptomatic disease |
Using the pen needle |
Personal experience with test |
Doubts about validity |
Information on different risk factors |
Personal experience with disease |
Comparing colours of dipstick with chart |
Repeated tests gave same results |
Was test performed correctly? |
Indications for test |
Serious disease |
What to do with low‐positive result |
Test worked properly |
Obligation to discuss test with doctor |
How to perform the test |
Reassurance/health status |
Test measures only total cholesterol |
Package indicated test is reliable |
Test is of little value |
Test involves pen needle |
Individual risk for disease/complaints |
|
Tests are developed to be of good quality |
Abnormal result: Not worried |
Reliability |
Need valid reason to see doctor |
|
Test is random indication |
Discuss test with doctor |
What can influence test result |
Can do the test at any time |
|
Physicians doubt self‐tests |
Did not see doctor: |
Test is random indication |
No need for making appointment |
|
Test result not what was expected |
Can only change diet |
Point‐of‐sale information |
Doctor refused to do test |
|
Tests are still being developed |
Test did not work properly |
What to do after test |
|
|
Commercially available |
Mild abnormality |
|
|
|
Test is too cheap or too easy to be of good quality |
Is only point estimate |
|
|
|
|
Feeling healthy |
|
|
|
|
Lifestyle changes: already trying to eat a healthy diet or hard to change |
|