Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 28;17(1):60–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00733.x

Table 3.

Summary of themes and main outcomes

Reasons for self‐testing Performing and interpreting the test result Confidence in test result Follow‐up Information needs
Test was offered/media attention Generally no problems Test is offered by well‐known organization Normal test result: Reassurance, no further action Explanation about disease
Curious Problems experienced Tests are also used by professionals Discuss test with doctor  Types of cholesterol
Asymptomatic disease  Using the pen needle Personal experience with test  Doubts about validity  Information on different risk factors
Personal experience with disease  Comparing colours of dipstick with chart Repeated tests gave same results  Was test performed correctly? Indications for test
Serious disease  What to do with low‐positive result Test worked properly  Obligation to discuss test with doctor How to perform the test
Reassurance/health status  Test measures only total cholesterol Package indicated test is reliable  Test is of little value  Test involves pen needle
Individual risk for disease/complaints Tests are developed to be of good quality Abnormal result: Not worried Reliability
Need valid reason to see doctor Test is random indication Discuss test with doctor  What can influence test result
Can do the test at any time Physicians doubt self‐tests Did not see doctor:  Test is random indication
No need for making appointment Test result not what was expected  Can only change diet Point‐of‐sale information
Doctor refused to do test Tests are still being developed  Test did not work properly What to do after test
Commercially available  Mild abnormality
Test is too cheap or too easy to be of good quality  Is only point estimate
 Feeling healthy
Lifestyle changes: already trying to eat a healthy diet or hard to change