Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 2;17(2):278–290. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00749.x

Table 3.

Comparison of pre‐, post‐ and follow‐up jury questionnaire responses to rating Likert questions for both juries

Questions Jury Times Frequencies of answers (row %) Medians (pre‐ to post‐jury) P‐value* Medians (post‐ to follow‐up jury) P‐value*
Very important Important Moderately important Of little importance Not important at all Total
Age Northern Alberta Pre‐jury 7 (44) 3 (19) 4 (25) 2 (13) 0 16 (100) 2 to 2 0.96 2 to 2 0.47
Post‐jury 5 (31) 7 (44) 3 (19) 0 1 (6) 16 (100)
Follow‐up 7 (44) 4 (25) 3 (19) 1 (6) 1 (6) 16 (100)
Southern Alberta Pre‐jury 3 (20) 5 (33) 5 (33) 1 (7) 1 (7) 15 (100) 2 to 1 0.08 1 to 2 0.34
Post‐jury 8 (53) 2 (13) 5 (33) 0 0 15 (100)
Follow‐up 5 (33) 4 (27) 6 (40) 0 0 15 (100)
Current health/severity of illness Northern Alberta Pre‐jury 5 (31) 7 (44) 4 (25) 0 0 16 (100) 2 to 2 0.48 2 to 2 0.32
Post‐jury 4 (25) 7 (44) 4 (25) 1 (6) 0 16 (100)
Follow‐up 3 (19) 11 (69) 2 (13) 0 0 16 (100)
Southern Alberta Pre‐jury 3 (20) 10 (67) 2 (13) 0 0 15 (100) 2 to 2 0.56 2 to 2 0.61
Post‐jury 7 (47) 6 (40) 1 (7) 1 (7) 0 15 (100)
Follow‐up 6 (40) 6 (40) 2 (13) 1 (7) 0 15 (100)
Imminence of death Northern Alberta Pre‐jury 7 (44) 7 (44) 2 (13) 0 0 16 (100) 2 to 2 0.45 2 to 2 0.78
Post‐jury 6 (38) 6 (38) 4 (25) 0 0 16 (100)
Follow‐up 7 (44) 6 (38) 4 (25) 0 0 16 (100)
Southern Alberta Pre‐jury 6 (40) 6 (40) 2 (13) 1 (7) 0 15 (100) 2 to 2 0.83 2 to 2 0.71
Post‐jury 5 (33) 7 (46) 2 (13) 1 (7) 0 15 (100)
Follow‐up 5 (33) 7 (47) 3 (20) 0 0 15 (100)
Health gain/improvement Northern Alberta Pre‐jury 9 (56) 5 (31) 2 (13) 0 0 16 (100) 1 to 1 0.08 1 to 1 0.32
Post‐jury 13 (81) 3 (19) 0 0 0 16 (100)
Follow‐up 12 (75) 3 (19) 3 (19) 0 0 16 (100)
Southern Alberta Pre‐jury 7 (47) 6 (40) 2 (13) 0 0 15 (100) 2 to 1 0.10 1 to 1 0.66
Post‐jury 9 (60) 6 (40) 0 0 0 15 (100)
Follow‐up 9 (60) 5 (33) 1 (7) 0 0 15 (100)

*Wilcoxon signed rank test.