Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 20;17(3):311–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00769.x

Table 5.

Confirmed factor analysis of satisfaction models

SFL t‐Value Model fit
Perceived (Service) Quality (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.93)
PQ1 0.72 9.01 χ2/d.f. = 2.06
PQ2 0.69 8.77 GFI = 0.897
PQ3 0.73 9.54 AGFI = 0.845
PQ4 0.59 7.81 RMSR = 0.03
PQ5 0.73 10.99
PQ6 0.75 11.42
PQ7 0.81 12.61
PQ8 0.81 12.78
PQ9 0.65 9.40
PQ10 0.58 8.11
PQ11 0.66 9.54
PQ12 0.86 13.95
PQ13 0.76 11.58
PQ14 0.75 11.02
PQ15 0.77 11.43
Perceived value (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.81; CR = 0.88; AVE = 0.50)
PV1 0.74 10.40 χ2/d.f. = 7.89
PV4 0.81 11.77 GFI = 0.956
PV5 0.77 10.97 AGFI = 0.781
PV6 0.61 8.19 RMSR = 0.04
(Overall) Satisfaction (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.90; CR = 0.90; AVE = 0.80)
S1 0.84 13.34 χ2/d.f. = 1.39
S2 0.67 9.64 GFI = 0.984
S3 0.75 11.33 AGFI = 0.953
S4 0.87 13.97 RMSR = 0.02
S5 0.86 13.85

SFL, standard factor loading; CR, composite reliability; AVE, average variance extracted; AGFI, adjusted goodness‐of‐fit; GFI, goodness‐of‐fit; RMSR, root mean square residual.