Table 4.
Author | Battery name—designed for… | Informant reports contained in battery | Ability tested | Direct tests contained in battery | Ability tested | Ppts, age, and group | Type of ID | Outcome and comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Burt et al. (2000) [69]—United States | Working Groups Battery—designed for dementia diagnosis in ID. |
|
|
|
|
1–1.5 hours to administer. Longitudinal administration is crucial to observing clinical change. |
||
Palmer (2006) [82] - USA | Not given—designed for dementia assessment in individuals with Mental Retardation. |
|
|
|
22 ppts Aged: 33–66 years Groups: Cases = Dementia Controls = matched for IQ, age, presence of DS and sex but no dementia present. |
Mild or Moderate ID. |
2–2.5 hours to administer. Cases < Controls in all areas assessed. |
|
Van der Wardt et al. (2011) [87]—UK, applied setting | Cognitive computerized test battery for individual's with intellectual disabilities (CCIID)—designed to assess IQ in individuals with ID. | N/A | N/A |
|
|
Reliability and validity studies were conducted in various ID populations and showed the CCIID to be a valid and reliable instrument for testing IQ. | ID all levels |
30 minutes to administer. Originally designed as an IQ test for verifying eligibility for Paralympic sporting events, but has been suggested for use in dementia assessment – not yet tested however for this purpose. |
Silverman et al. (2004) [89]—United States, applied setting (ppts' residence or day program facility) |
|
|
|
|
273 ppts Aged: 45+ years After testing grouped into:
|
All levels of ID. | 2 hours to administer. 18 month longitudinal analysis presented. Findings suggest that by conducting a full assessment of cognitive abilities like presented here, diagnosis of dementia can be made a lot more rapid and accurate. |
|
Das et al. (1995) [36]—United States and Canada, applied setting (quiet rooms in workshops, group or independent living setting) | Das Naglieri Cognitive Assesment System—designed to assess cognitive decline due to aging among individuals with Downs Syndrome. | N/A | N/A |
|
63 ppts Aged: 50–62 Groups
|
ID with DS or ID without DS with equivalent level of ID. |
1.5–4 hours to administer – a lot of variation in time taken. 2 < than all other groups on all tasks. Seen most on tasks requiring planning and attention. |
|
Crayton et al. (1997) [97]—UK | Neuropsychological Assesment of dementia in adults with intellectual disability—designed for dementia assessment in Downs syndrome. | Cognitive test battery was compared to…
|
|
|
|
70 ppts Aged: 28+ Mean Age: 42.8 Groups
|
DS |
1.5 hours to administer. VABS and all neuropsychological tests negatively correlated (sig) – preexisting global cog impairment shown on these tests No difference between age groups (1, 2, and 3) on neuropsychological deficits. – because of screening method used before study. 2 & 3 < 1 performance on memory tests (sig) Results suggest sensitive tests that were used could be useful in dementia diagnostic process. |
Oliver et al. (1998) [101] – UK | Different test batteries were collated, including the CANTAB and CAMCOG, plus extra tests added for the purpose of this study. (Please see across) – designed to detect age-related cognitive change in DS. |
|
|
|
|
57 ppts Aged: 30+ Groups
|
DS |
Does not state how long the battery took to administer. 28.3% of ppts showed severe cognitive deterioration, like apraxia or agnosia. A higher prevalence of these impairments was associated with older age. Rate of cognitive deterioration also ↑ w/age & degree of pre-existing cognitive impairment. Deterioration in memory, learning and orientation preceded the acquisition of aphasia, agnosia and apraxia. Pattern of cognitive deterioration seen with individuals who have DS in this study is comparable to the pattern reported in individuals who have Alzheimer's disease but do not have DS. |
Jozsvai et al. (2002) [104]—UK, Clinical Setting | Not given—designed to assess cognitive decline in DS. |
|
|
|
|
35 ppts Aged: 28+ years Groups: Cases = diagnosed DAT using DSDS (n = 12) Controls = without DAT (n = 23) |
DS
|
Doesn't state how long the battery took to administer. FLUD and IO shown to be most useful tests in battery—must be wary of practice effects though. BNT and BD, most effected by aging & had least diagnostic ability. |
Johansson et al. (2002) [106]—Sweden | Not given—designed to assess dementia in DS. | Informants were interviewed with questions regarding the ppts abilities in the following aspects and any changes observed in these abilities:
|
|
9 ppts Aged: 26–56 Groups:
|
DS |
Ppt section took 1.5–2 hours to administer. Advocates a combination of testing and interviewing in order to gain a full clinical picture. |
||
Witts (1998) [107]—UK, applied setting (adult training centers. | Severe Impairment Battery (SIB [108])—designed to assess cognitive functioning of the severely demented client. |
|
-Adaptive behavior | Battery tests focus on:
|
33 ppts Mean age = 36 years |
DS |
20 minutes to administer. Good reliability and validity found. No floor effects encountered. Should be used longitudinally. |
Abbreviations: ID, intellectual disabilities; DS, Down syndrome; DAT, dementia Alzheimer's type; ↑, increases; ppts, participants.
NOTE. Tests highlighted in bold indicate repeated use within studies. Age is denoted in years.