Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 15;14(3):769. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2016.03.769

Table 4.

Ranking of Importance.

Factor Unimportant Of a little importance Moderately importance Important importance Very importance Missing importance
Cost of Programming 18(11.20%) 12(7.50%) 26(16.10%) 37(23.00%) 62(38.50%) 6(3.70%)
Scope of Programming (Area or Practice) 14(8.70%) 19(11.80%) 29(18.00%) 23(14.30%) 70(43.50%) 6(3.70%)
Location of Meetings 15(9.30%) 18(11.20%) 17(10.60%) 40(24.80%) 65(40.40%) 6(3.70%)
Type of Program Offerings (mode of delivery) 8(5.00%) 29(18.00%) 29(18.00%) 50(31.10%) 40(24.80%) 5(3.10%)
Social Interaction with Live Programming 63(39.10%) 23(14.30%) 23(14.30%) 24(14.90%) 22(13.70%) 6(3.70%)