Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 13.
Published in final edited form as: Asian J Psychiatr. 2016 Apr 23;22:53–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2016.04.002

Table 2.

Comparisons of NSS scores between three study groups.

Neurological soft signs Mean rating score of NSS
ANOVA Euthymic BPI patients vs non-affected relatives Euthymic BPI patients vs healthy controls Non-affected relative vs healthy controls
BPI patients
Mean ± SD
Relatives
Mean ± SD
Healthy controls
Mean ± SD
F (2,88) (p value#) p-value (after Hochberg correction p-value (after Hochberg correction p-value (after Hochberg correction
Sensory integration
Audio-visual integration 0.97 ± 0.83 0.47 ± 0.73 0.47 ± 0.77 4.18 (0.018) 0.042 0.042 1.000
Graphesthesia (right & left) 2.64 (1.27) 1.76 ± 1.38 1.36 ± 1.24 7.71 (0.001) 0.030 0.001 0.554
Sequencing of complex motor acts
Fist ring test (right & left) 2.38 ± 1.11 1.80 ± 1.15 1.23 ± 1.04 8.31 (0.0005) 0.117 0.0003 0.142*
Fist palm test 0.97 ± 0.98 0.37 ± 0.71 0.23 ± 0.62 7.46 (0.001) 0.012 0.001 0.886
Tap copying test 1.42 ± 0.84 0.93 ± 0.88 0.43 ± .67 11.36 (0.00004) 0.063 0.000022 0.059*
Response inhibition
Go-no-go-test 1.19 ± 0.83 0.43 ± 0.67 0.43 ± 0.56 11.93 (0.00003) 0.00018 0.00017 1.000
Motor coordination
Rapid alternate movement test (right & left) 0.83 ± 1.34 0.24 ± 0.83 0.03 ± 0.18 6.24 (0.003) 0.042 0.003 0.771

Significant p-values are highlighted.

*

Significant before Hochberg correction.