Table 2.
Dep. Variable (Y) | Indep. variable (X) | Mediator (M) | Y = β + βxX | M = β + βxX | Y = β + βxX + βMM + ε | ZZobel | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
βx | βx | βx | βM | ||||
Perceptual map, 1 dim. | Complexity | Arousal ratings | 0.734** | 0.751** | 0.105n.s. | 0.839** | 3.20** |
Loudness | Arousal ratings | −0.601* | −0.678* | 0.039n.s. | 0.943** | −2.68** | |
Sharpness | Arousal ratings | −0.680* | −0.649* | −0.147n.s. | 0.822** | −0.2.51* | |
Attack | Arousal ratings | −0.811** | −0.888** | 0.016n.s. | 0.931** | −4.6* | |
Decay | Arousal ratings | 0.831** | 0.867** | 0.143n.s. | 0.793* | 4.36** | |
Valence ratings | – | −0.638* | – | – | – | – | |
Arousal ratings | – | 0.917** | – | – | – | – |
The table shows the effect on the first dimension of the perceptual map by the independent variables along with the results following the causal step method by Baron and Kenny (1986). The final column shows the z-scores from the modified Sobel test.
Significant at 0.05-level.
Significant at 0.01-level.
Non-significant.