Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 22;115(8):967–973. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.206

Table 2. Multivariate Cox analysis for 5-year DFS and BCSS in the derivation and validation cohorts.

  Hazard ratio (CI) Significance
Derivation cohort
5-year DFS    
 Lymph node 1.895 (1.453–2.472) P=0.00005
 Grade 1.560 (1.001–2.431) P=0.050
 Size 1.380 (0.918–2.173) P=0.121
 CERneg 4.441 (1.895–10.411) P=0.001
 CERimp 2.869 (1.240–6.639) P=0.014
 HER2+ 1.676 (1.004–2.798) P=0.048
BCSS    
 Lymph node 1.833 (1.428–2.353) P=0.000002
 Grade 1.504 (1.026–2.203) P=0.036
 Size 1.711 (1.196–2.448) P=0.003
 CERneg 2.024 (1.065–3.848) P=0.031
 CERimp 1.788 (0.974–3.283) P=0.061
 HER2+ 1.182 (0.717–1.948) P=0.511
5-year DFS in ER+ patients    
 Lymph node 2.027 (1.281–3.209) P=0.003
 Grade 1.646 (0.899–3.012) P=0.106
 Size 1.208 (0.639–2.35) P=0.561
 CERimp 2.469 (1.049–5.810) P=0.038
 PRneg 0.956 (0.409–2.236) P=0.917
 HER2+ 4.160 (1.803–9.603) P=0.001
BCSS ER+ patients    
 Lymph node 2.070 (1.406–3.049) P=0.0002
 Grade 1.825 (1.167–2.855) P=0.008
 Size 1.723 (1.167–2.806) P=0.029
 CERimp 1.946 (1.054–3.596) P=0.033
 PRneg 0.928 (0.464–1.858) P=0.833
 HER2+ 1.535 (0.644–3.629) P=0.329
Validation cohort
DFS    
 Lymph node 1.818 (1.282–2.579) P=0.001
 Grade 1.266 (0.731–2.192) P=0.400
 Size 1.416 (0.825–2.428) P=0.207
 CERneg 5.722 (2.727–12.003) P=0.000004
 CERimp 2.431 (1.196–4.941) P=0.014
DFS in ER+ patients    
 Lymph node 2.388 (1.554–3.671) P=0.00007
 Grade 1.445 (0.805–2.594) P=0.218
 Size 1.299 (0.680–2.480) P=0.428
 CERimp 2.096 (1.010–4.351) P=0.047
 PRneg 0.763 (0.299–1.948) P=0.571

Abbreviations: BCSS=breast cancer-specific survival; CER=combined endocrine receptor; CI=confidence interval; DFS=disease-free survival; ER=oestrogen receptor; HER2+=human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive; imp=impaired; neg=negative; PR=progesterone receptor.