Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 6;33(11):2935–2946. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw175

Table 2.

Partitioning of Total Evidence into Three Classes of Genes Based on Parental SNP Differences for the Three Reciprocal Crosses.

Cross type and parameters Homozygous SNPs only Heterozygous SNPs only Both types of SNPs
1. S. peruvianum cross (n genes) 383 5,951 1,895
 # candidate MEGs 28 265 58
 # candidate PEGs 8 136 28
 mat. prop. 1616A 0.649 0.643 0.651
 mat. prop. 1616J 0.702 0.682 0.687
2. S. chilense cross (n genes) 278 2,078 204
 # candidate MEGs 2 37 1
 # candidate PEGs 7 57 6
 mat. prop. 4329B 0.642 0.625 0.645
 mat. prop. 4329K 0.644 0.639 0.655
3. Hybrid cross (n genes) 995 1,265 1,851
 # candidate MEGs 153 160 257
 # candidate PEGs 2 4 0
 mat. prop. 1616A 0.842 0.845 0.848
 mat. prop. 4329B 0.706 0.688 0.708

Note.—“mat. prop.”, median maternal proportions for a given cross direction and class of genes.