Table 1.
Fifteen randomized, placebo-controlled trials assessing the effect of statins on renal outcomes in diabetic nephropathy
Studies | Country | Intervention | Sample sizes (n) | Use of ACEI or ARB (%) | Mean age (years) | Duration of diabetic nephropathy, (years) | Follow-up (months) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
statin | control | statin | control | statin | control | statin | control | ||||
CARDS 2009 [9] | UK | Atorvastatin, 10 mg/d | 1154 | 1159 | 44.6 | 43.6 | 61.5 | 61.8 | — | — | 24 |
Masanori 2011 [10] | Japan | Rosuvastatin, 2.5–10 mg/d | 52 | 52 | 100 | 100 | 64.5 | 64.9 | — | — | 6 |
Dalla 2003 [11] | Italy | Atorvastatin 10 mg/d | 12 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 66 | 63 | 10 | 9 | 12 |
Linda 2001 [12] | USA | Simvastatin, 10 mg/d | 19 | 20 | 5 | 15 | 33.3 | 31.0 | 22.8 | 20.8 | 18 |
E. Hommel 1992 [13] | Denmark | Simvastatin, 10–20 mg/d | 12 | 9 | 67 | 89 | 41 | 35 | 27 | 27 | 3 |
Lam 1995 [14] | China | Lovastatin, 30 mg/d | 16 | 18 | 12.5 | 16.7 | 58.9 | 53.9 | — | — | 24 |
S.Nielsen 1993 [15] | Denmark | Simvastatin 10–20 mg/d | 8 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 65 | 10.2 | 10.9 | 9 |
Zhang 1995 [16] | Belgium | Pravastatin, 20 mg | 10 | 10 | — | — | 43 | 43 | — | — | 3 |
Giancarlo 1997 [17] | Italy | Simvastatin, 20 mg/d | 10 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 62 | — | — | 12 |
Tsukasa 2005 [18] | Japan | Pitavastatin, 1 mg/d | 10 | 10 | — | — | 51 | 49 | 13 | 12 | 12 |
Tsukasa 2001 [19] | Japan | Cerivastatin, 0.15 mg/d | 30 | 30 | — | — | 58 | 55 | — | — | 6 |
Wu 2013 [20] | China | Atorvastatin, 20 mg/d | 39 | 39 | 100 | 100 | 55.15 | 55.33 | 5.18 | 4.82 | 6 |
Du 2015 [21] | China | Atorvastatin, 20 mg/d | 26 | 26 | 100 | 100 | 56 | 57 | 10 | 10 | 3 |
Xiang 2005 [22] | China | Simvastatin, 20 mg/d | 32 | 31 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 49 | 15 | 14 | 6 |
USA the United States of America, UK United Kingdom, T2DM type 2 diabetes mellitus, T1DM type 1 diabetes mellitus, —:not report