Table 2.
Hypothesis | P | Δ AIC | AICw | P | Δ AIC | AICw | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
h | π | ||||||
cpDNA | PLAH | 0.040 | 6.680 | 0.024 | 0.020 | 2.681 | 0.164 |
PPPH | 0.360 | 0.000 | 0.680 | 0.100 | 0.000 | 0.629 | |
Both | 0.080 | 2.000 | 0.277 | 0.020 | 2.756 | 0.158 | |
Retraction | 0.200 | 7.187 | 0.019 | 0.002 | 5.095 | 0.049 | |
ITS | PLAH | 0.194 | 2.852 | 0.111 | 0.040 | 2.000 | 0.241 |
PPPH | 0.498 | 0.000 | 0.465 | 0.140 | 0.000 | 0.587 | |
Both | 0.194 | 1.287 | 0.243 | 0.020 | 3.428 | 0.106 | |
Retraction | 0.378 | 1.876 | 0.181 | 0.040 | 4.382 | 0.066 |
Data obtained from 2,000 simulations using the software BayeSSC. (P) two-tailed probability. ∆ AIC and AICw Akaike Information Criterion delta and weights. PLAH, Pleistocene Arc Hypothesis, PPPH, Amazon SDF Hypothesis; Both, pattern matching both hypotheses PLAH + PPPH; Retraction, pattern matching a strong range retraction. See Fig. 5 for details about the demographical scenarios. h haplotype diversity, π nucleotide diversity