Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 13;17:426. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1275-5

Table 3.

Summary of Secondary Endpoints during Part II

Naproxen 1000 mg (Part I)/1000 mg (Part II) Etoricoxib 60 mg (Part I)/60 mg (Part II) Etoricoxib 60 mg (Part I)/90 mg (Part II) LS mean difference between etoricoxib 60 mg/90 mg vs. Etoricoxib 60 mg/60 mg; p-Value Etoricoxib 90 mg (Part I/90 mg (Part II)
Number of Subjects n = 74 n = 175 n = 178 n = 70
LS Mean Change from Week 6 in Spinal Pain Intensity Over Weeks 10 and 12 (95 % CI) (Inadequate Responders in Part I) −12.89 (−16.57, −9.20) −7.26 (−9.73, −4.80) −9.97 (−12.42, −7.51) −2.70 (−4.88, −0.52) −7.69 (−11.48, −3.90)
LS Mean Change from Week 6 in PGART Over Weeks 10 and 12 (95 % CI) (Inadequate Responders in Part I) 0.21 (0.07, 0.35) 0.13 (0.04, 0.23) 0.21 (0.12, 0.30) 0.08 (−0.05, 0.21) 0.28 (0.13, 0.42)
Number of Subjects n = 141 n = 310 n = 314 n = 140
Time-weighted LS Mean Change from Baseline in Spinal Pain Intensity Over 26 Weeks (95 % CI) −38.26 (−41.70, −34.83) −35.07 (−37.41, −32.73) −36.30 (−38.65, −33.96) −1.70 (−5.79, 2.39) −36.76 (−40.22, −33.31)

LS least squares, CI confidence interval, PGART patient global assessment of response to therapy