. 2016 Oct 13;9:63. doi: 10.1186/s12920-016-0224-3

Table 2.

A summary of tasks, participating teams, and winners of the challenge

	GWAS	Whole genome comparison
Application 1: Secure outsourcing	Task 1.1 – MAF & $χ^{2}$ (Winner: Stanford/MIT)	Task 1.2 (a) – Hamming distance (Winner: IBM)
	Task 1.1 – MAF & $χ^{2}$ (Winner: Stanford/MIT)	Task 1.2 (b) – Approximate Edit distance (Winner: Microsoft)
	Participating teams: IBM; Stanford/MIT; Microsoft; UC Irvine (UCI); University of Tsukuba
Application 2: Secure collaboration	Task 2.1– MAF & $χ^{2}$ (Winner: U of Maryland)	Task 2.2 (a) – Hamming distance (Winner: University of Virginia)
	Task 2.1– MAF & $χ^{2}$ (Winner: U of Maryland)	Task 2.2 (b) – Approximate Edit distance (Winner: UC Irvine)
	Participating teams: Syracuse University (SU); University of Maryland (UMD); University of Notre Dame (UND); University of Virginia (UV); UC Irvine (UCI); Cybernetica AS (CAS); The Alexandra Institute (AI)