Table 3.
Seven single institution series with prolonged follow-up, assessing rates of recurrence following sub-total resection alone.
| Local Progression After Sub-Total Resection Alone | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local Progression Rate | ||||||
| Author | Institution | Year | n | 5-year | 10-year | 15-year |
| Wara | UCSF | 1975 | 58 | 47% | 62% | - |
| Barbaro | UCSF | 1987 | 30 | 40%* | 100%* | - |
| Mirimanoff | MGH | 1985 | 80 | 37% | 55% | 91% |
| Condra | U of Florida | 1997 | 55 | 47% | 60% | 70% |
| Mirabell | MGH | 1992 | 79 | 40% | 52%§ | - |
| Stafford | Mayo Clinic | 1998 | 116 | 39% | 61% | - |
| Soyuer | MD Anderson | 2004 | 32 | 62% | 82%* | 87%* |
| Total: | 450 | 37–62% | 52–100% | 70–91% | ||
n: number of patients
UCSF: University of California San Francisco; MGH: Massachusetts General Hospital;
U of Florida: University of Florida
*
data extracted from graph
§
8-year progression