Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct;62(10):e599–e607.

Table 3.

Direct FP access to advice from other specialists and diagnostic investigations, by province

QUESTION FULL SAMPLE, N (%) (N=1054)* PROVINCIAL COMPARISONS FDR P VALUE LOGISTIC REGRESSION


ONTARIO, N (%) (N=597)* MANITOBA, N (%) (N=228)* BRITISH COLUMBIA, N (%) (N=229)* ONTARIO, OR (REFERENCE) MANITOBA, OR (95% CI) BRITISH COLUMBIA, OR (95% CI)
Can you obtain specialist advice in less than 48 h regarding [strongly agree or agree] ...
  • investigations for suspected cancers? 562 (54.1) 298 (51.3) 109 (47.8) 155 (67.7) < .001 1.00 1.05 (0.74–1.49) 2.44 (1.72–3.46)
  • potential referrals to secondary care or specialist cancer services for suspected cancer? 504 (48.5) 258 (44.3) 103 (45.2) 143 (62.5) < .001 1.00 1.26 (0.88–1.78) 2.52 (1.80–3.52)
Do you have direct access to [yes] ...
  • all blood tests needed for cancer diagnosis? 815 (78.4) 470 (80.6) 158 (69.3) 187 (81.7) .002 1.00 0.67 (0.46–0.99) 1.20 (0.80–1.80)
  • endoscopy?
    -upper GI endoscopy 162 (15.6) 114 (19.5) 31 (13.8) 17 (7.5) .0003 1.00 0.48 (0.29–0.80) 0.30 (0.17–0.52)
    -flexible sigmoidoscopy 163 (16.1) 103 (18.1) 30 (13.6) 30 (13.3) .2 1.00 0.62 (0.38–1.02) 0.68 (0.43–1.07)
    -colonoscopy 179 (17.2) 131 (22.2) 30 (13.3) 18 (8.0) < .001 1.00 0.45 (0.28–0.74) 0.29 (0.17–0.49)
   • imaging?
    -x-ray scan (full body) 1012 (96.4) 581 (98.0) 211 (92.5) 220 (96.1) .002 1.00 0.30 (0.13–0.69) 0.53 (0.21–1.33)
    -CT (full body) 973 (92.9) 564 (95.1) 197 (86.4) 212 (93.8) .0002 1.00 0.46 (0.25–0.83) 0.90 (0.46–1.77)
    -MRI (full body) 852 (84.2) 539 (91.7) 170 (74.6) 143 (73.0) < .001 1.00 0.37 (0.23–0.58) 0.27 (0.17–0.42)
    -ultrasound (full body) 971 (92.6) 566 (95.5) 192 (84.2) 213 (93.4) < .001 1.00 0.31 (0.17–0.56) 0.74 (0.38–1.45)

CT—computed tomography, FDR—false discovery rate, GI—gastrointestinal, MRI—magnetic resonance imaging, OR—odds ratio.

*

Not all respondents answered all questions. Proportions are calculated based on the number of responses to the question.