Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 13;11(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s11657-016-0286-z

Table 3.

Included studies

Age reported Country Sample context Number Data collection analysis
Beaton [23] 64 (47–80) Canada Fragility fracture: fracture clinic 24 (18 women) 5 focus groups, grounded theory
Hallrup [24] 76–86 Sweden Fragility fracture: fracture prevention programme 13 women In-depth interview, phenomenology
Besser [25] 69 (SD 10.1) UK OP/osteopenia and medication: OP screening unit/rheumatology 14 women Semi-structured interviews, thematic analysis
De-souza [26] 36–79 Brazil OP; calcium disorders unit 12 (11 women) Non-structured interviews grounded theory
French [27] 67.4 (52–87) Canada Osteopenia (13)/OP (17): OP treatment programme 30 women Focus group, thematic analysis
Giangregorio [28] 67.5 (SD 12.7) Canada Fragility fracture: fracture clinic 127 women Telephone interview, thematic analysis
Hallberg [29] 68–84 Sweden Fragility fracture (vertebral): follow-up study 10 women Semi-structured interviews, thematic analysis
Hansen [30] 65–79 Denmark Fragility fracture (first known): DEXA scan clinic 15 women Open interviews, phenomenology
Iversen [31] 65–85 USA OP/osteopenia and medication: adverts in hospital newsletter 32 (30 women) 3 focus groups, thematic analysis
Jachna [32] 84 (71–93) USA OP and fragility fracture (hip): assisted living facility 5 women Semi-structured interviews, content analysis
Lau [33] 70 (48–88) Canada OP/osteopenia and medication: primary and secondary healthcare professionals 37 women 7 focus groups, phenomenology
Mazor [34] 73.4 (SD 6.2) USA OP/osteopenia and medication/multi-specialty group practice 36 women Telephone interview, thematic analysis
Mckenna [35] 43–82 UK OP: support groups; exercise classes and 5 Asian community centres. 21 women Semi-structured interviews, phenomenology
Meadows [36] 40–65 Canada Fragility fracture: women and bone health study 19 women Semi-structured interviews, thematic analysis
Meadows [37] 40–65 Canada Fragility fracture: women and bone health study 24 women 4 focus group, thematic analysis
Nielson [38] 51–82 Denmark OP (men): department of endocrinology 16 men 4 focus groups, phenomenology
Nielson [39] 50–84 UK/Denmark OP and DEXA scan: OP management or self-help group 14 (10 women) Semi-structured interviews, phenomenology
Paier [40] USA Fragility fracture (vertebral): via healthcare professionals 5 women Semi-structured interviews, phenomenology
Quantock [41] 70 (65–76) UK OP (severe): OP service 11 women Focus group, thematic analysis
Qvist [42] 68 (60–93) Sweden Fragility fracture (vertebral): exercise programme 11 women Open interviews, thematic analysis
Richardson [43] 33–81 UK DEXA scan: DEXA scan clinic 15 women Semi-structured interviews ‘template analysis’
Roberto [44] 53–89 USA OP: community adverts 21 women 4 focus groups, thematic analysis
Sale [45] 49–82 Canada OP: OP-screening programme 18 (14 women) Semi-structured interviews, phenomenology
Sale [46] 47–80 Canada Fragility fracture and DEXA scan: OP-screening programme 24 (18 women) 5 focus groups, thematic analysis
Sale [47] 65–88 Canada Fragility fracture: OP-screening programme 30 (21 women) Semi-structured interviews, phenomenology
Sale [48] 50–79 Canada Fragility fracture: OP-screening programme 25 (22 women) Semi-structured interviews, phenomenology
Sale [49] 65–88 Canada Fragility fracture: OP-screening programme 21 (15 women) Semi-structured interviews, phenomenology
Sale [50]
Sale [51] 51–89 Canada Fragility fracture: advert in patient newsletter 28 (26 females) Telephone interview, phenomenology
Sale [52]
Salter [53] 70–85 UK OP and medication: multi-centre trial 30 women Semi-structured interviews, thematic analysis
Solimeo [54] 70.36 (53–86) USA OP (men): bone health clinic 23 men Semi-structured interviews, thematic analysis
Weston [55] 68–79 UK OP and medication: OP screening trial 10 women Semi-structured interviews, phenomenology
Wilkins [56, 57] 65.3 (54–80) Canada OP: OP clinic or self-help group 28 women In-depth interview, thematic analysis