Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 14;22(38):8576–8583. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i38.8576

Table 1.

Relationship between expression of proteins and clinicopathologic parameters

Variable n c-MYC expression PCNA expression TIMP1 expression
Strong (n = 118) Low (n = 211) P value1 Strong (n = 78) Low (n = 241) P value1 Strong (n = 193) Low (n = 136) P value1
Sex
Male 207 69 136 47 160 119 88
Female 122 49 73 0.236 31 81 0.324 74 48 0.573
Age, median (range) 62 (21-82)
Histology grade, differentiation
Well 10 4 6 2 8 5 5
Moderate 143 48 95 36 107 57 86
Poor 176 66 110 0.738 40 136 0.844 131 45 < 0.01
Pathologic T stage
T1 24 9 15 5 19 11 13
T2 78 30 48 7 71 41 37
T3 74 28 46 15 59 53 21
T4 153 51 102 0.848 51 102 < 0.01 88 65 0.045
Lymphovascular invasion
Yes 153 56 97 37 116 90 63
No 176 62 114 0.796 41 135 0.850 103 73 0.956
Perineural invasion
Yes 127 45 82 32 95 88 39
No 202 73 129 0.897 46 156 0.615 105 97 < 0.01
Chemotherapy
Yes 99 43 56 24 75 58 41
No 230 75 155 0.060 54 176 0.881 135 95 0.985
EMVI
Positive 53 18 35 13 40 32 21
Negative 276 100 176 0.752 65 211 0.878 161 115 0.782
Location
Below peritoneal reflection 120 41 79 31 89 71 49
At peritoneal reflection 43 22 21 4 39 25 18
Above peritoneal reflection 166 55 111 0.080 43 123 0.059 97 69 0.990
1

P value was obtained by χ2 test. EMVI: Extramural vascular invasion.