Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 30;28(5):624–628. doi: 10.5021/ad.2016.28.5.624

Table 1. Summaries of six patients with perianal or vulva EMPD.

Clinicopathological factor Patient number
1 2 3 4 5 6
Clinical findings
 Tumor location Perianal Perianal Vulva Perianal Vulva Vulva
 Sex Male Female Female Male Male Male
 Age at diagnosis (yr) 74 69 81 78 75 74
 Chief complaint Eczema Eczema Eczema and itching Eczema Eczema Eczema and itching
 Duration of symptom (mo) 72 36 30 2 84 120
Mapping biopsy of the anal canal
 Number of biopsies 12 12 21 Not performed 16 12
 Biopsy-positive site DL 0.5-cm above DL Anal verge - Anal verge Anal verge
Surgical findings
 Surgical procedure WLE WLE WLE WLE+APR WLE WLE
 Reconstruction method STSG STSG STSG STSG STSG STSG
 Lymph node dissection No No Yes No Yes No
 Covering colostomy Yes Yes No - No No
Pathological findings
 Resection margin Negative Negative Negative Positive Negative Negative
 Histological stage Intraepithelial Intraepithelial Invasive Intraepithelial Invasive Intraepithelial
 Lymph node metastasis No No Yes No Yes No
Outcomes
 Graft infection Yes No Yes No Yes No
 Postoperative hospital stay (d) 86 51 72 24 82 22
 Tumor recurrence No No Yes No Yes No
 Prognosis Alive Alive Died Alive Alive Alive
 Disease free survival (mo) 37.2 112 2.9 50.2 13.1 5.8
 Overall survival (mo) 37.2 112 12.8 50.2 37.4 5.8

EMPD: extramammary Paget disease, DL: dentate line, WLE: wide local excision, APR: abdominoperineal resection, STSG: split thickness skin graft.