Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 13;36(21):2715–2727. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00138-16

TABLE 1.

Serum biochemistry of WT, CD36Tg, and CD36Tg-plus-Dox mice fed chow diet or HFD for 19 weeks

Parameter Value for:
Chow diet-fed mice
HFD-fed mice
WT (n = 5) CD36Tg
(n = 4)
CD36Tg + Dox (n = 4) WT (n = 7) CD36Tg
(n = 6)
CD36Tg + Dox (n = 4)
Total cholesterol (mg/dl) 114.3 ± 16.2 114.6 ± 8.8 119.2 ± 9.3 129.4 ± 22.1 165 ± 15.6b 137.9 ± 14.5
Triglyceride (mg/dl) 51.8 ± 10.2 49.9 ± 9.5 58.5 ± 4.4 75.2 ± 20.0c 75.0 ± 7.7 75.2 ± 7.7
Free fatty acids (μM) 318.5 ± 86.9 294 ± 101.8 347.2 ± 151 496 ± 94.7d 526.5 ± 158.9 698.1 ± 145.9
ALT (U/liter) 26.4 ± 5.0 30.7 ± 7.3 21.4 ± 12.8 65.2 ± 6.7d 45.7 ± 17.4a 82.5 ± 30.0
AST (U/liter) 62.9 ± 20.1 68.9 ± 10.7 71.0 ± 14.3 225.7 ± 38.8d 166.4 ± 17.6a 265.9 ± 65.1
Fasting blood glucose (mg/dl) 128.7 ± 17.2 143.8 ± 3.2 127.4 ± 14.2 187.9 ± 35.6c 190.1 ± 24.2 183.9 ± 23.3
Fasting insulin (ng/ml) 0.4 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.5 0.4 ± 0.08 8.3 ± 4.08d 12.4 ± 6.1 6.1 ± 2.0
a

P < 0.05 compared to the WT within the diet group.

b

P < 0.01 compared to the WT within the diet group.

c

P < 0.05 for WT mice fed an HFD compared to WT mice fed chow to validate the HFD model.

d

P < 0.01 for WT mice fed an HFD compared to WT mice fed chow to validate the HFD model.