Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 6;43(4):516–528. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13136

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Summary of the effect of repetition number on the response to Standard and Deviant stimuli and the difference between them (MMA). The relationship between repetition number and (A and D) the strength of the response to Standard stimuli, (B and E) the strength of the response to Deviant stimuli and (C and F) the strength of MMA in each monkey. The upper row shows the results at the population level. An effect of repetition number was significant for the response to Deviant stimuli and in MMA (panel i in B, C, E and F) in both monkeys (Friedman's test, all < 0.0001, FDR correction, q = 0.05) and in the response to Standard stimuli in monkey Q (panel i in D; < 0.0001). Horizontal bars represent the pairs showing significant differences in post hoc comparisons (sign‐tests with FDR correction, q = 0.05). Vertical bars represent the 95% confidence interval. *< 0.005, **< 0.001. The middle row shows the results at the single‐electrode level. Light gray lines indicate the electrodes with > 0.05 (Friedman's test), dark gray lines indicate the electrodes with < 0.05 and black lines indicate the electrodes surviving FDR correction (q = 0.05). The bottom row shows the distribution of the electrodes surviving FDR correction (black markers) and the electrodes with < 0.05 (gray markers). Triangles and inverted triangles represent electrodes showing significant increases and decreases, respectively, in any one of the post hoc comparisons. Circles represent the electrodes exhibiting no significant difference in post hoc comparisons. Std, Standard; Dev, Deviant.