Table 3.
Overall | Household with at least one member with NCDs | Household without any member with NCDs | P-valuea | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Catastrophic health expenditure, % | ||||
Slum areas | 10.0 | 20.7 | 6.6 | <0.001 |
Non-slum areas | 6.6 | 10.5 | 4.5 | <0.01 |
P-valueb | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.20 | |
Impoverishment, % | ||||
Slum areas | 5.1 | 10.3 | 3.5 | <0.01 |
Non-slum areas | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 0.94c |
P-valueb | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.09 |
NCDs non-communicable diseases
aχ2 test to compare between households with at least one member with and without NCDs
bχ2 test to compare between households in slum and non-slum areas
cFisher’s exact test