Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 13;5:174. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0356-8

Table 2.

Comparison of mean of PRISMA for abstracts items reported in abstracts of meta-analyses of RCT

Variables N Univariable analysisa Multivariable analysisb
Means (standard deviation) Mean difference (95 % CI) p value Adjusted means (95 % CI) Adjusted mean difference (95 % CI) p value
Year
 - 2012 (ref) 84 6.7 (1.6) 7.0 (6.5; 7.5) <0.001*
 - 2014 59 6.8 (1.6) 0.1 (−0.4; 0.7) 0.694 6.9 (6.4; 7.4) −0.1 (−0.6; 0.4) 0.711**
 - 2015 61 7.5 (1.6) 0.8 (0.2; 1.3) 0.007 7.8 (7.4; 8.3) 0.9 (0.4; 1.3) 0.001***
Abstract word count
 - <300 (ref) 30 8.3 (2.0) 6.9 (6.3; 7.4)
 - ≥300 113 6.7 (1.4) −0.3 (−1.3; −1.0) <0.001 7.6 (6.8; 8.4) 0.7 (−0.4; 1.8) 0.184
PRISMA endorsement
 - Non endorser journals (ref) 43 7.9 (1.9) 7.7 (7.1; 8.2)
 - Endorser journals 100 6.6 (1.4) −1.3 (−1.9; −0.7) <0.001 6.8 (6.2; 7.4) −0.8 (−1.7; 0.04) 0.063
Abstract format
 - IMRAD (ref) 47 6.4 (1.6) 6.9 (6.3; 7.4)
 - 8-headings 96 7.3 (1.6) 0.8 (0.4; 1.3) <0.001 7.6 (7.2; 8.0) 0.7 (0.2; 1.2) 0.008
Publication on behalf of a group
 - No (ref) 131 7.0 (1.7) 7.3 (7.0; 7.7)
 - Yes 12 6.7 (1.4) −0.3 (−1.1; 0.4) 0.394 7.1 (6.5; 7.8) −0.2 (−0.8; 0.5) 0.557
Number of authors
 - ≤6 (ref) 64 6.9 (1.6) 0.1 (−0.4; 0.6) 0.659 7.2 (6.7; 7.6)
 - >6 79 7.0 (1.7) 7.3 (6.9; 7.7) 0.2 (−0.3; 0.6) 0.464

Ref reference for mean difference calculation, PRISMA preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis, IMRAD introduction, methods, results, and discussion

aStudent’s t test, *Global p value

bGeneralized estimation equations with journals as grouping variable. Goodness of Fit: value of the Corrected Quasi-likelihood under Independence Model Criterion = 1827.12 and the value of the Quasi-likelihood under Independence Model Criterion = 1829.28

After Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, values are **1.0 and *** 0.002