Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 5;12:698–706. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.09.023

Table 2.

PPI analyses: Defining GAD-specific interaction effects of the ROI analysis as seed regions (daI/FO, pMCC, dlPFC) revealed significant FC differences between GAD patients and each other group in response to threat vs. neutral pictures.

Seed region Finding region x y z F mm3
Left daI/FO Right mid-dlPFC 24 49 16 5.58 296
Left pMCC Right amygdala 22 1 − 19 5.70 152
Right ventral anterior insula 23 20 − 8 5.98 144
Left posterior dlPFC Right vlPFC 30 26 − 13 6.30 144



Planned comparisons revealed GAD-specific FC patterns in response to threat vs. neutral pictures (seed– finding region)
pMCC - amygdala pMCC - aI daI/FO - mid-dlPFC dlPFC - vlPFC
GAD vs. SAD t[39] = 2.25, p = 0.030 t[39] = 2.64, p = 0.012 t[39] = 3.78, p = 0.001 t[39] = 4.28, p < 0.001
GAD vs. PD t[39] = 3.82, p < 0.001 t[39] = 3.69, p = 0.001 t[39] = 2.63, p = 0.012 t[39] = 2.40, p = 0.021
GAD vs. HC t[39] = 4.05, p < 0.001 t[39] = 4.80, p < 0.001 t[39] = 4.41, p < 0.001 t[39] = 4.67, p < 0.001

Note. PPI, psychophysiological interaction analyses; FC, functional connectivity; GAD, generalized anxiety disorder; SAD, social anxiety disorder; PD, panic disorder; HC, healthy controls; pMCC, posterior mid cingulate cortex; vlPFC, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex; dlPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; daI/FO, dorsal anterior insula/frontal operculum; L, left; R, right; x, y, z, Talairach coordinates of maximally activated voxel (activation threshold: p < 0.05 corrected).