Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 14;11(10):e0163963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163963

Table 1. Sample characteristics (n = 435).

Wave 1 Wave 2
Age (mean ± SD) 39.1 ± 9.1
Sex
 Male 22.7
 Female 77.3
Education (%)
 No formal education 3.4
 Primary education 26.0
 Some secondary education 47.6
 Grade 12 / matriculation 20.0
 Tertiary education 3.1
Peer adherence intervention (%) 85.1
CASE 1 15.1 ± 2.3 15.5 ± 1.8
Health status (EQ-VAS) 2 81.8 ± 17.3 82.1 ± 16.5
Positive coping (mean ± SD) 3 4.9 ± 0.4 4.9 ± 0.4
Avoidant coping (mean ± SD) 4 4.1 ± 1.7 3.8 ± 1.5
Social support seeking coping (mean ± SD) 5 1.5 ± 0.7 1.7 ± 0.6
External stigma (mean ± SD) 6 11.3 ± 2.9 11.5 ± 2.8
Internal stigma (mean ± SD) 7 4.5 ± 1.9 4.4 ± 1.8
Per capita household income (ZAR, mean ± SD) 588.6 ± 609.5 830.5 ± 3000.2
Household size (mean ± SD) 3.2 ± 1.9 3.1 ± 1.9
Family functioning (FACI-8)
 Attachment
 Higher than ideal at Wave (%) 34.0 21.3
 Lower than ideal at Wave (%) 25.5 34.0
 Changeability
 Higher than ideal at Wave (%) 6.9 8.3
 Lower than ideal at Wave (%) 50.7 48.1

1 The CASE adherence index ranges between 3 and 16 (higher values denoting better adherence)

2 The EQ-VAS asks patients to indicate their overall health on a vertical visual analogue scale (a 20 com vertical line), ranging from “worst possible” (0) to “best possible” health (100).

3 The Positive coping scale ranges from 0 to 5 (higher values denoting more positive coping)

4 The Avoidant coping scale ranges from 0 to 9 (higher values denoting more avoidant coping)

5 The social support seeking coping scale ranges from 0 to 2 (higher values denoting more social support seeking coping)

6 The external stigma scale ranges from 5 to 20 (higher values denoting more stigma)

7 The internal stigma scale ranges from 3 to 12 (higher values denoting more stigma)