Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Occup Environ Hyg. 2016 Dec;13(12):960–968. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1200723

TABLE II.

Comparison Data (MRT and STI).

Facepiece Listener 1
Std Dev
Listener
2 Std
Dev
Listener 3
Std Dev
Pooled Std
Dev Across
Listeners
3M FR-M40 8.0 11.6 6.0 8.5
Avon C50 10.2 10.9 3.5 8.2
Peltor M-TAC 7.4 5.8 9.8 7.7
Drager CDR 4500 6.8 5.7 6.5 6.3
MSA Millenium 8.5 2.6 9.4 6.8
Survivair Optifit 9.6 13.6 5.3 9.5
MSA Ultra Elite 5.0 1.9 10.0 5.6
Scott M120 5.4 5.5 7.0 6.0
North 5400 6.5 9.7 8.2 8.1
3M FR 7800B 7.4 7.9 11.6 9.0
Scott M110 8.3 4.4 9.4 7.4
Avon FM12 3.1 5.9 7.4 5.5
Pooled Std Dev 7.4
*Data aggregated from Coyne and Barker(24) Tables: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22,
Facepiece Test
Run
Mean St Dev
1A 1 0.538 0.014
1A 2 0.555 0.012
1A 3 0.535 0.012
1A 4 0.514 0.018
1A 5 0.553 0.017
1A 6 0.540 0.012
1A 7 0.531 0.014
2A 1 0.535 0.024
2A 2 0.567 0.014
2A 3 0.536 0.012
2A 4 0.519 0.013
2A 5 0.553 0.012
2A 6 0.544 0.016
2A 7 0.539 0.015
3A 1 0.547 0.018
3A 2 0.550 0.013
3A 3 0.537 0.010
3A 4 0.533 0.010
3A 5 0.549 0.012
3A 6 0.543 0.011
3A 7 0.525 0.011
pooled std dev 0.014
Pooled difference between means 0.016
* Data from Symons [2012] Table 2