Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 15;8(2):e192. doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v8i2.6733

Table 6. A comparison of principal component analyses from three separate data groups (2006 Census Profile, 2005 taxfiler and 2011 taxfiler datasets) pertaining to the census metropolitan area of Guelph performed utilizing only the four income variables.

Source Dataset Component Eigenvalue Difference Proportion Cumulative
2006 Census Profile PC1 2.530160 1.741550 0.6325 0.6325
C2 0.788604 0.206443 0.1972 0.8297
C3 0.582160 0.483082 0.1455 0.9752
C4 0.099079 ── 0.0248 1.0000
2005 Taxfiler PC1 2.908720 2.121430 0.7272 0.7272
C2 0.787294 0.532456 0.1968 0.9240
C3 0.254838 0.205690 0.0637 0.9877
C4 0.049148 ── 0.0123 1.0000
2011 Taxfiler PC1 2.766560 1.929580 0.6916 0.6916
C2 0.836980 0.485802 0.2092 0.9009
C3 0.351178 0.305902 0.0878 0.9887
C4 0.045277 ── 0.0113 1.0000
Source Dataset Indicator Variable PC1 Variable Loadings
2006 Census Profile Median Family Income ($) *0.5257
Median Single Person Income ($) 0.538
Low Income Families, After-tax (%) **-0.4864
Low Income Unattached, After-tax (%) -0.4445
2005 Taxfiler Median Family Income ($) -0.4477
Median Single Person Income ($) -0.5343
Low Income Families, After-tax (%) 0.557
Low Income Unattached, After-tax (%) 0.4516
2011 Taxfiler Median Family Income ($) -0.4593
Median Single Person Income ($) -0.5295
Low Income Families, After-tax (%) 0.5505
Low Income Unattached, After-tax (%) 0.4535