Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 5;160(2):249–259. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-4000-z

Table 3.

Observation in metastasis breast cancer of the concordance between HER2/ECD and CA 15.3 changes and subsequent medical imaging conclusion (progression or regression of metastases) (an event = a medical imaging)

All events
n = 65
Bone metastases
n = 20
Liver metastases
n = 16
Lung metastases
n = 9
Brain metastases
n = 10
Multiple organ metastases n = 10
% HER2/ECD consistent with imaging conclusion 94 90 100 89 90 100
% CA 15.3 consistent with imaging conclusion 85 85 94 78 67 90
Imaging conclusion on metastasis evolution: progression
n = 35
regression
n = 30
progression
n = 8
regression
n = 12
progression
n = 8
regression
n = 8
progression
n = 6
regression
n = 3
progression
n = 7
regression
n = 3
progression
n = 6
regression
n = 4
% HER2/ECD consistent with imaging conclusion 91 97 88 92 100 100 83 100 86 100 100 100
% CA 15.3 consistent with imaging conclusion 80 90 88 83 88 100 67 100 57 100 100 80