Table 1.
An outline of core operations in auditory cognition and their clinical and neuroanatomical correlates
Auditory cognitive operation | Clinical correlates | Neuropsychological tests | Procedurea | Neuroanatomical correlates [13, 82] |
---|---|---|---|---|
Feature detection | Cortical deafnessb, tinnitusc | Sound detection Gap-in-noise detection AM/FMd detection Spatial lateralisation |
Detection of any sound (e.g., tone) behaviourally/EP [83] Detection of short silent interval in white noise burst [76] Detection of modulation (vibrato) of intensity/pitch in carrier tone [76] Detection of right-left sound shift based on inter-aural phase/intensity cues [76] |
PAC, lat HG, PT, pSTG, subcortical circuits |
Feature analysis | Word deafnesse, dystimbriaf, amusiag | Phoneme discrimination MBEA pitch/temporal subtests |
Discrimination of sound pairs/sequences differing in pitch, temporal or timbral characteristics [49, 79, 84] Labelling of features in a single sound (e.g., tone glide direction ‘up’ or ‘down’) [7] |
lat HG, pSTG/STS, aSTG, subcortical circuits |
Scene analysis | Auditory disorientation | SSI-ICM Speech-in-noiseh Spatial localisation Dichotic listening |
Identification of a sentence spoken over background message same ear [34] Identification of words against background noise/multi-talker babble Discrimination of sound location/movement in real or virtual space [9, 10] Attention to one of two stimuli played simultaneously via each ear [23] |
PT/pSTG, IPL, PFC, hippocampus, subcortical circuitsi |
Object representation (apperceptive processing) | Auditory apperceptive agnosias, musical and verbal hallucinations | Melody discrimination Distorted melodies Voice discrimination Accent processing |
Discrimination of (unfamiliar) melodies [56, 85] Identification of an altered familiar melody [85] Discrimination of (unfamiliar) speakers [57] Speech perception under unfamiliar accents [8, 52] |
PT, pSTG/STS, IPL, aSTG |
Object recognition (semantic processing) | Auditory associative agnosias (including phonagnosia) | Environmental sound, melody, voice recognition | Recognition of familiar sounds, tunes, voices; conventionally assessed by naming the target but can be assessed by forced-choice or matching cross-modally (e.g., sound–picture) [56] or within-modality (perceptually dissimilar sound excerpts, categorisation based on semantic characteristic) [7, 49, 54, 55], familiarity decision [56] in patients with aphasia | aSTG, TP, insula |
Emotional valuation | Receptive dysprosodia, auditory anhedonia, Musicophilia | Emotion recognition Emotional response |
Naming, forced choice [55, 64, 66, 86] or cross-modal labelling of emotions in sounds Behavioural rating of valence, arousal; autonomic indices [68] |
MTL, insula, OFC, ACC, mesolimbic/striatal circuits |
Working memory/attentionj | Auditory neglect/inattention | Compare sequential sounds Oddball detection Dichotic listening |
n-back tasks (e.g., [77]) Sustained attention with detection of target deviants behaviourally/EP [87] Attention to one of two stimuli played simultaneously via each ear [75] |
Fronto–parieto–temporal, subcortical circuits |
ACC anterior cingulate cortex, AM/FM amplitude/frequency modulation, a/pSTG anterior/posterior superior temporal gyrus, EP electrophysiological evoked potentials, IPL inferior parietal lobe, lat HG lateral Heschl’s gyrus, MBEA Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia, MTL mesial temporal lobe, OFC orbitofrontal cortex, PAC primary auditory cortex, PFC prefrontal cortex, PT planum temporale, SSI-ICM synthetic sentence identification with ipsilateral competing message, STS superior temporal sulcus, TP temporal pole
aFew widely available tests or population norms are available for auditory cognition. These are mainly used in research settings, but certain instruments may be suitable for systematic clinical assessment of cognitively impaired patients (e.g., Newcastle Auditory Battery [76]; Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia [77]; Queen Square Tests of Auditory Cognition for auditory object processing, voice and scene analysis [6–9, 48, 57])
bSubtotal cortical deafness often manifests as auditory agnosia
cTinnitus is mediated by distributed circuitry also including subcortical, anterior and limbic structures
dNeuroanatomical correlates vary with modulation rate
eMechanism of word deafness may be heterogeneous
fImpaired perception of timbre (that property distinguishing two sounds of identical pitch, duration and loudness, e.g., musical instrument voices)
gImpaired perception of music due to a cerebral cause
hSpeech-in-noise perception is impaired with cochlear dysfunction so interpretation of any more central deficit must be cautious [23]
iMaintaining alertness and attention
jParticularly during auditory scene analysis but relevant to auditory sequence processing more generally (auditory neglect/inattention unusual in dementia but impaired monitoring of acoustic events common)