Table 5.
Reference | Total na | Treatment | Exercise-induced BM loss (%)b | Fluid volume intake for rehydration (%) | Fluid intake (L)b | Alcohol intake (g) | Monitoring time (h) | Effect on cumulative urine output (p) | Euhydration after treatment? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shirreffs and Maughan (11) | 6 | 0% beer | 2.0 | 150 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 6 | 0.307 | Only <1 h after treatment |
1% beerc | 17.7 | ||||||||
2% beerc | 35.9 | ||||||||
4% beerc | 68.0 | ||||||||
Hobson and Maughan (10) | 12 | Euhydrated + 0% beer | Euhydrated: ~0.6 | - | 1.0 | 0.0 | 4 | 0.057 | - |
Euhydrated + 4% beerc | 31.6 | <0.001 | |||||||
Dehydrated + 0% beer | Dehydrated: ~2.5 | Equal amount for all treatments | 0.0 | Higher urine output with euhydrated treatments vs. dehydrated. | |||||
Dehydrated + 4% beerc | 31.6 | ||||||||
Desbrow et al. (15) | 7 | 2.3% beer | 2.0 | 150 | 2.5 | 57d | 4 | <0.05e | Only <1 h after treatment |
2.3% beer + 25 mmol L−1 Na | 59d | ||||||||
4.8% beer | 120d | Lower urine output for 2.3% + 25 vs. 4.8 and 4.8% + 25 | |||||||
4.8% beer + 25 mmol L−1 Na | 122d | ||||||||
Flores-Salamanca and Aragón-Vargas (12) | 11 | 0.5% beer | 2.1 | 100 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 3 | 0.001 | No |
4.5% beer | 6.4 | Higher urine output for 4.5 vs. 0.5% and water | |||||||
Water | 60.1 | ||||||||
Jiménez-Pavón et al. (17) | 16 | 660 mL 4.5% beer + mineral water ad libitum | ~2.4 | ~90 | 1.6 | ~24 | – | 0.70 | No |
Mineral water ad libitum | 0.0 | Rehydration period was 2 h, no separate monitoring period | |||||||
Desbrow et al. (16) | 12 | 2.3% beer + 25 mmol L−1 Na | 2.0 | 150 | 2.3 | ~53d | 4 | <0.05e | Only <1 h after treatment |
2.3% beer + 50 mmol L−1 Na | ~52d | ||||||||
3.5% beer + 25 mmol L−1 Na | ~81d | Lowest urine output for 2.3% + 50 vs. all other treatments | |||||||
3.5% beer + 50 mmol L−1 Na | ~78d | ||||||||
Wijnen, present study | 11 | 0% beer | 1.0 | 100 | 0.74 | 0.0 | 5 | 0.681 | No |
2% beer | 12.1 | ||||||||
5% beer | |||||||||
Isotonic sports Drink | 28.9 | ||||||||
Water |
aAll participants were males.
bData have been rounded up to the nearest tenth.
cThese beverages consisted of a non-alcoholic base with alcohol added to it.
dDifferences in g alcohol in beverages with the same alcohol percentage occurred because of small differences in body mass loss.
eExact significant p-value or F ratio for main effects was not reported.